Skirt Cafe is an on-line community dedicated to exploring, promoting and advocating skirts and kilts as a fashion choice for men, formerly known as men in skirts. We do this in the context of men's fashion freedom --- an expansion of choices beyond those commonly available for men to include kilts, skirts and other garments. We recognize a diversity of styles our members feel comfortable wearing, and do not exclude any potential choices. Continuing dialog on gender is encouraged in the context of fashion freedom for men. See here for more details.
I agree with you Charlie - that is a reasonably good article. I enjoyed reading it. As you say, there is a lot of irrelevant chatter in the replies (and I skipped a lot of it as I got bored) but nevertheless, there is a lot of positive stuff there. Lot of negatives as well. But that's life.
I left a comment, but it looks like the bulk of the discussion was back in April.
It's never too late to have a happy childhood . . .
I have trouble with an article called "Men in Skirts" that shows a picture of a man wearing a corset. I know this may come as a surprise for some, but corests and skirts are two different garments. The result of that confusion is that this article is really about "men wearing clothing that implies woman's body parts" or "men cross-dressing" and not really about skirts at all.
I have trouble with an article called "Men in Skirts" that shows a picture of a man wearing a corset.
I think that was meant to be a 'tongue in cheek' sort of comment - a joke if you will. The actual article didn't in any way suggest or imply that a man who wears a skirt is anything other than just a man - who happens to wear a skirt. I thought the article was very supportive of the idea of MIS - and questioned the status quo quite strongly.
It's never too late to have a happy childhood . . .
Bob wrote:I have trouble with an article called "Men in Skirts" that shows a picture of a man wearing a corset. I know this may come as a surprise for some, but corests and skirts are two different garments. The result of that confusion is that this article is really about "men wearing clothing that implies woman's body parts" or "men cross-dressing" and not really about skirts at all.
That bothered me too. The opinion would have stated the case very well without the bizarre photo which will unavoidably taint every reader's first impression of the issue.
Sasq
Cat on a tin roof, dogs in a pile,
Nothin' left to do but smile, smile, smile!