Mind Blow

Non-fashion, non-skirt, non-gender discussions. If your post is related to fashion, skirts or gender, please choose one of the forums above for it.
User avatar
moonshadow
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 7294
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 1:58 am
Location: Lake Goodwin, Washington
Contact:

Re: Mind Blow

Post by moonshadow »

Sinned wrote:how come the majority of folks wear trainers when they never do any training or running or any other form of exercise?
What is a trainer?

The google god has failed me on this one... it keeps coming up as someone who "trains" people or animals. Somehow that doesn't fit the context to this discussion.

Is this an English thing? :lol: Like pudding? :D
Stevie D
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 479
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 9:56 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: Mind Blow

Post by Stevie D »

moonshadow wrote:
Sinned wrote:how come the majority of folks wear trainers when they never do any training or running or any other form of exercise?
What is a trainer?

The google god has failed me on this one... it keeps coming up as someone who "trains" people or animals. Somehow that doesn't fit the context to this discussion.

Is this an English thing? :lol: Like pudding? :D
Trainers (English) = informal sports shoes, sneakers (US)
Stevie D
(Sheffield, South Yorkshire)
User avatar
moonshadow
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 7294
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 1:58 am
Location: Lake Goodwin, Washington
Contact:

Re: Mind Blow

Post by moonshadow »

Stevie D wrote:
moonshadow wrote:
Sinned wrote:how come the majority of folks wear trainers when they never do any training or running or any other form of exercise?
What is a trainer?

The google god has failed me on this one... it keeps coming up as someone who "trains" people or animals. Somehow that doesn't fit the context to this discussion.

Is this an English thing? :lol: Like pudding? :D
Trainers (English) = informal sports shoes, sneakers (US)
Oh well, once again I stand corrected. I didn't mention it, but I actually thought it had something to do with underwear! :lol: Would've never had thought... shoes!
User avatar
Kirbstone
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 5792
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 7:55 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: Mind Blow

Post by Kirbstone »

This side of the Atlantical Pond the wearing of 'trainers' has become pretty universal and they are truly unisex, apart from foot size. Lots of them nowadays are highly coloured and those for kids come with flashing lights built into the soles.

Up until quite recently they were only seen on the tennis court or in the gym, but in common with the track suit they are everywhere now. Slovenly unisex dressing is here. Pity.

I don't (dress like that).

Tom
Carpe Diem......Seize the Day !
User avatar
Couya
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 461
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 6:45 pm

Re: Mind Blow

Post by Couya »

Nor do I, Tom.
I think trainers are about the ugliest shoe yet invented, especially when they have a band of white round the sole, and will never look clean.

Martin, in sandals or old-fashioned leather shoes when necessary.
User avatar
Couya
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 461
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 6:45 pm

Re: Mind Blow

Post by Couya »

I can understand trousers being in the plural, but have never understood why legless underpants and swimming costumes (under various names) alway have "-s".
The only exception is "bikini", although this, originally women's beachwear, always has two parts. Is this yet another example of making a distinction between the sexes?

Martin
User avatar
Sinned
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 5804
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:28 pm
Location: York, England

Re: Mind Blow

Post by Sinned »

Well, the bikini is the fashion industry's idea of cutting down on material and having a double take, monetarily, of covering the same area. As well as appealing to men's sense of ....

But the monokini still has my vote on this as it removes the distinction between the sexes. :shock: :D

Now who are the ones spoiling the party, the question was meant to be rhetorical. :!:
I believe in offering every assistance short of actual help but then mainly just want to be left to be myself in all my difference and uniqueness.
User avatar
crfriend
Master Barista
Posts: 15283
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: New England (U.S.)
Contact:

Re: Mind Blow

Post by crfriend »

Kirbstone wrote:This side of the Atlantical Pond the wearing of 'trainers' has become pretty universal and they are truly unisex, apart from foot size. Lots of them nowadays are highly coloured and those for kids come with flashing lights built into the soles.
It looks like the styles for the kiddies may have design or manufacturing "issues". It seems the things use lithium batteries, and just recently a pair self-immolated in the back seat of the family car in New England, nearly taking the car with 'em. They weren't on the kid at the time, otherwise that'd definitely been a case of "hot-foot".

Trainers off the "field of battle" started getting popular in the 1980s in these here parts, mainly by young women, and worn to/from their places of employment. The disconnect between office attire and trainers was grating at the time, giving rise to my use of the term "bimbo booties" for the "style". In more recent years, the rest of the attire has been dumbed down so the disconnect isn't there any more.
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
User avatar
crfriend
Master Barista
Posts: 15283
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: New England (U.S.)
Contact:

Re: Mind Blow

Post by crfriend »

Couya wrote:I think trainers are about the ugliest shoe yet invented, especially when they have a band of white round the sole, and will never look clean.
One word: "Birkenstocks". I swear the manufacturer held focus groups in order to deliberately design something so hideous.
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
User avatar
moonshadow
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 7294
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 1:58 am
Location: Lake Goodwin, Washington
Contact:

Re: Mind Blow

Post by moonshadow »

Sinned wrote:Well, the bikini is the fashion industry's idea of cutting down on material and having a double take, monetarily, of covering the same area. As well as appealing to men's sense of ....

But the monokini still has my vote on this as it removes the distinction between the sexes. :shock: :D

Now who are the ones spoiling the party, the question was meant to be rhetorical. :!:
Dennis... have you been on the hooch this morning? :lol:
Disaffected.citizen
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 6:16 am
Location: UK

Re: Mind Blow

Post by Disaffected.citizen »

crfriend wrote:
Couya wrote:I think trainers are about the ugliest shoe yet invented, especially when they have a band of white round the sole, and will never look clean.
One word: "Birkenstocks". I swear the manufacturer held focus groups in order to deliberately design something so hideous.
I'll see your Birkenstocks and raise you the Ugg Boot!
User avatar
crfriend
Master Barista
Posts: 15283
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: New England (U.S.)
Contact:

Re: Mind Blow

Post by crfriend »

Disaffected.citizen wrote:I'll see your Birkenstocks and raise you the Ugg Boot!
I would have hoped that the Aussies would have had better sense than that abomination, but I guess I stand corrected.

That said, I'll stand by my original assertion of Birkenstocks and we shall see where the chips fall.

(Both are really positively hideous, and no matter whose assertion "wins" both remain hideous.)
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
User avatar
rick401r
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 400
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 4:23 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Mind Blow

Post by rick401r »

Hey, I resemble that remark! I own (and wear) 2 pair of Birkenstocks. I find them extremely comfortable and easily slipped on for a quick run to the mailbox.
dillon
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 2719
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: southeast NC coast

Re: Mind Blow

Post by dillon »

crfriend wrote:
Disaffected.citizen wrote:I'll see your Birkenstocks and raise you the Ugg Boot!
I would have hoped that the Aussies would have had better sense than that abomination, but I guess I stand corrected.

That said, I'll stand by my original assertion of Birkenstocks and we shall see where the chips fall.

(Both are really positively hideous, and no matter whose assertion "wins" both remain hideous.)
(rick401r) Hey, I resemble that remark! I own (and wear) 2 pair of Birkenstocks. I find them extremely comfortable and easily slipped on for a quick run to the mailbox.
I usually try to hold my tongue about people's fashions, though occasionally I find toes in my mouth as well as fingers... But as my sainted mother always said: "If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all."
As a matter of fact, the sun DOES shine out of my ...
User avatar
Sinned
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 5804
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:28 pm
Location: York, England

Re: Mind Blow

Post by Sinned »

Dillon, I thought it was Thumper that said that.
I believe in offering every assistance short of actual help but then mainly just want to be left to be myself in all my difference and uniqueness.
Post Reply