
This is both sad and unnerving, that this can happen in a "free" society. :irked:
The proprietors are keeping the trademark and will concentrate of women's apparel. I wish them well.
So much for a free society!Jock wrote:Some very sad news - CitySkirt has stopped manufacturing skirts for men, This has been because of a hate campaign against the company from unknown people who, it appears, don't want the idea of men in skirts to catch on.
This is both sad and unnerving, that this can happen in a "free" society. :irked:
The proprietors are keeping the trademark and will concentrate of women's apparel. I wish them well.
I suspect that a lot of what Dan said was stated in the "heat of the moment" following one hell of a lot of needlessly-induced stress. He'd come under some fairly intense fire from various neo-con factions (and those can be fairly intimidating because they all march (goose-step?) in lock-step) and was sufferering from lackluster sales of his line. Given his market demographic, I can understand his frustration with the latter because it's tiny -- John Q. Public is just not ready to slap on a skirt and head to the office (or job-site, although that may actually be more accepting), nor is Jane Q. Public going to accept "her man" (the breadwinner) in anything less than the uniform that guarantees success (it doesn't, but that's neither here nor there). I believe it was a combination of the assault of the neo-cons AND his level of frustration that finally rang the death-knell for CitySkirt. In any event, CitySkirt will be missed.Since1982 wrote:I still say you don't have to be a crossdresser or a militant kilter to wear a skirt! That's where Dan has stuck all the rest of us. Either we're crossdressers or stuck in kiltie land. I for one am neither!
Nope, your avatar looks like a bloke wearing a skirt. Nothing more, nothing less.Since1982 wrote:One small question here, does my avatar look like that of a crossdresser or a kilty?