Sarongman wrote:Carl, 17000 miles is still the equivalent of hearing the bullet whistle past the ear. Just a few degrees difference----! We haven't been hit by a catastrophic size yet, but the odds shorten, don't they?
I was operating under the "a miss is as good as a mile" rule. But, yes, the odds of a serious strike do shorten as time progresses.
Skirted_in_SF wrote:BTW, the accompanying article in the Wall Street Journal says that 100 tons of dust and sand size particles are added to the earth daily from space.
So it's about a hundred. I was off by some. In any event, the number is miniscule compared to our planetary mass, our planet having cleared most of its orbit of the big junk billions of years ago. It must've been a wild knockabout time when
that was going on!
On sonic booms: I recall those from my very young days and always thought they were pretty cool -- from a distance. Close in, they did cause damage, and that finally forced lawmakers to ban supersonic flight over land (except in conditions of "extreme emergency" of course). It's quieter now. Recall that a sonic boom is multispectral in its content; there's a strong high-frequency component in it which contributes to the shattering effects and there's also a very large infrasonic component that causes deformation and buckling of things. I missed that episode of
Mythbusters, but would like to have seen it.
In the case of the recent meteor incident in Russia, I head one woman talking to the BBC about the event and she described the bright light from outside and several moments later the blast. Personally, if I saw something like that I'd be diving for cover if at all possible. If something is hot enough to be emitting bright white light there will most likely be a blast following.