Jamie, I do agree, with a few adjustments, although there may be a strong femme tendency under many skirted, not all men are wanting anything femme, in that retrospect, it would be wiser to word your statements otherwise, more neutral.
And I would even argue that the word Femme is slowly undergoing a meaning transformation. I would think that men even in the manly dress can dress manly and femme, femme meaning a finer, more delicate way of dressing. Having nothing to do with having a woman's body, wanting to have children etc.
Secondly, everybody should be free when the whistle blows, but men who really want to stand up for what they believe in, for their own freedom, should I would think wear what they please, skirts / dresses whatever, outside of working hours. By doing that, they not only take the freedom they rightly have, but pave the way for other up and comming skirt weares to follow. Big brother is watching us enough as it is. The influence of employers and collegues should end when the whistle blows. ( or the digital clock shows end working time....

) It is not only the bosses, but the collegues which may seem to feel threatening. That is certainly the case when the skirt wearers themselves are not fully sure of their choice.
Some men are rightly careful when it comes to fitting in in their work group, because apparently they feel they are in a threatened posisition. That is bad even without skirts.
I think the message is to stand for what you believe in. Stand for your choice in government party, in your beliefs, in your choice to wear skirts in the way you feel pleases you. There may be consequences, as with all choices in life we make. You may feel intimidated out of work hours, and act accordingly, then the consequence is certain, I would think that in most cases there is only a feeling of consequence, coming from your own insecure feeling. Being who you are is what we live for, fight for. Go to bloody war for. It may take men with balls to stand up for what they believe in, but it is worth every second. If you agree or not, Nelson Mandela is a good example of that. But all actions should be within reason, OURS not "theirs". Jeopardising your only source of income, if it would come to that, for your right to dress differently may be extreme for some, and on first sight not wise, but being dominated, a slave your whole life isn't exactly what we want either.
A man is the same man in a pair of pants or a skirt. It is only the way people look at him that makes the difference.