Presidental Candidates & Men's Fashion Freedom

[ziggy_encaoua]

A thread explaining that Ron Paul had something to do with skirts for men (of which I was not aware) would have been appreciated

Well the presidential elections start for real tomorrow with the Iowa Corcass & next week it’s the first open primary in New Hampshire.

So what’s this got to do with wearing a skirt?

Well the practice of Men’s Fashion Freedom is still an issue of free though we all wish it wasn’t such an issue.

Political candidates do spearhead a political attitude & that attitude can be an influence (*think Blair in ’97) so the presidential campaign is important to us & who wins could affect public attitude towards us.

Its no secret I support Ron Paul & think he’s the candidate who’s most concrete on the issue of free expression.

But who do think is the presidential candidate who’s most friendly towards Men’s Fashion Freedom?

[crfriend]

A thread explaining that Ron Paul had something to do with skirts for men (of which I was not aware) would have been appreciated

Well the presidential elections start for real tomorrow with the Iowa Corcass & next week it’s the first open primary in New Hampshire.

Correction: This is the start of the primary elections in the United States of America. This is where the major parties, amongst themselves, pick which candidate will represent them in the final election which is to be held in November, 2008 -- that's almost 11 months away -- where the major parties will square off and see how they do in general balloting. Also, the goings-on in Iowa are called "caucuses" (look it up); the first formal primary is in New Hampshire in another week's time.

So what’s this got to do with wearing a skirt?

Precisely nothing.

Well the practice of Men’s Fashion Freedom is still an issue of free though we all wish it wasn’t such an issue.

...an issue of free... WHAT Free expression? Free will? Free love?

Mens' "fashion freedom" (whatever that may be) has precisely nothing to do with whatever political flack gets "elected" to office -- unless said freedom is explicitly and specifically called out in his (or her) party's platform. Furthermore, such "freedom" is quite far down the overall scope of important issues and, I'd posit, doesn't even belong in a party's political platform -- any party.