I wear them turned down just under the knee, but that's a matter of taste. What I can say is that they are warm.

Merry Christmas!
Slainte!
While on shoes, it is possible to find larger shoes, boots from some manufactures, IF you can find out who is selling them, AND then be prepaired to pay in some cases a small fortune for them. While a size or two smaller may even be much cheaper, ( or not) as the case may be.sapphire wrote:Yikes! I hadn't realized they were THAT expensive. We have a tack shop around the corner and I got mine on sale for $75USD
That being said, I much prefer my $23USD work boots for the snow because of the tread.
I suspect the dynamic may change if a man is riding "Western" style as opposed to "English" style. Cowboy boots (the real article, I'm not talking about your "Urban Cowboy" teeter-totter boots) should still be available as that's still a reasonably valid line of work, and should be perfectly functional as riding attire. It's with the English style where the disparity will rear its head; men who ride in that style primarily do so for competition, and that form happens at a stratum of "society" that most blokes never come close to.BrotherTailor wrote:Fashion injustice extends far beyond men/women to include minorities, very few men ride, and so manufacturers refuse to cater to them. This is one reason why I first got into sewing my own stuff.
I always took that term to mean home-building one's own capacitors (being an electronics type). You mean you're actually supposed to smoke 'em?BrotherTailor wrote:Just like "roll your own". (cept I smoke a pipe...)
Yep, that'd be "English" style riding. I've often heard the "fox hunt" called "the unspeakable in pursuit of the inedible". I think that works.The local Hunt Club Kennel farm backed onto mine before it was moved. As a landowner I was invited to hunt with them and go on hound exercises...hence the need for proper attire and turnout.