Skirt Cafe is an on-line community dedicated to exploring, promoting and advocating skirts and kilts as a fashion choice for men, formerly known as men in skirts. We do this in the context of men's fashion freedom --- an expansion of choices beyond those commonly available for men to include kilts, skirts and other garments. We recognize a diversity of styles our members feel comfortable wearing, and do not exclude any potential choices. Continuing dialog on gender is encouraged in the context of fashion freedom for men. See here for more details.
WRONG!!! where your hair resides as you get older has nothing to do with age. It's all geneology. If DAD had thinning hair it's in the future for you, if he didn't, then a full head of hair (like mine) is in your future.
Something tells me that there's more to the hair equation than what the top of your father's head looked like at a certain age. For instance, my grand-dad was completely bald by the time he was in his mid 20s, and my dad had classic "male pattern baldness" and had lost everything from the top by 30. I, on the other hand, am creeping up on 50 and still have a pretty decent head of (waist-length) hair. My mother must've given me some pretty good genes for that to happen!
(Thanks, Mom, where ever you are.)
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
As far as I'm aware, men's hair distribution (or lack of) follows that of the blokes on the mother's side, not the father's. Certainly my sons have extremely hairy lower legs, i.e, below the knee, in total contrast to myself, but similar to those of my late father-in-law.
You've made my point Carl. Geneology is where MALE pattern baldness comes from. Whether it came from your dad or mom or all your relatives is moot, it's all geneology.
I had to remove this signature as it was being used on Twitter. This is my OPINION, you NEEDN'T AGREE.
Story of Life, Perspire, Expire, Funeral Pyre!I've been skirted part time since 1972 and full time since 2005. http://skirts4men.myfreeforum.org/
