"I'm English and I want to buy one of these, but I am unable to estimate the size I will need because the UK sizes are not shown".
She looked me up and down and replied: "I think you should try on the largest and next-to-largest sizes, then you will know for sure".
This was odd, because I hadn't said the item was for me, and I was with my wife and daughter! She pulled a couple of garments from the rack and took me to the "prøverum" (fitting room), but there was a long queue. She said to me:
"Do you know how many centimeters you have around the waist?"
"No. I just know in inches. My waist is about 36 inches".
"That's OK. We can estimate from that. Just a moment." She walked over to one of the tills and produced a folder with tables in.
"OK, now I know what size you are for menswear. Agh! I wish they would put the menswear equivalents for items THAT ARE OBVIOUSLY SUITABLE FOR BOTH MEN AND WOMEN"
Did I hear that right? This is a corduroy skirt, and she's saying that it's a garment suitable for both sexes? In the end, as I was about to board the ferry back to England, I decided to wait in the queue and try on the garments because I couldn't return it if it were the wrong size. The largest size they had did fit me (US size 16), and I bought one in maroon. A couple of hours later I boarded the ship with her words "THAT ARE OBVIOUSLY SUITABLE FOR BOTH MEN AND WOMEN" reverberating in my ears. Yes, I know H&M are a progressive and risk-taking brand. But to have a girl who works in a provincial branch saying that a woman's skirt is obviously suitable for men is somewhat encouraging. Don't you think?

Stu