On Pinterest you see men wearing all kinds styles of dresses. Below is a link to Pinterest with men in dresses.
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/pageants- ... 679615367/
Are you impress by any these styles?
On Pinterest you see men wearing all kinds styles of dresses. Below is a link to Pinterest with men in dresses.
This works for me.
I think you might have missed the point. The retailer was selling dresses as unisex. BUT they only show women wearing the dresses.mr seamstress wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:33 pmOn Pinterest you see men wearing all kinds styles of dresses. Below is a link to Pinterest with men in dresses.
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/pageants- ... 679615367/
Are you impress by any these styles?
This rings like the old classic of, "Lead, follow, or get out of the way."
Precisely. Until there is a sea change in men's attitude to wearing skirts and other "open ended" garments, then the whole idea will go nowhere. It's the sea change we're after -- it's not permission (we already have that, although we get singled out and occasionally harassed), it's the acceptance and uptake that will drive things. Until men -- and women -- shift their attitudes, the current state of affairs is going to persist.rivegauche wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 5:52 pmThere are social issues related to where we can wear them but that is hardly going to change because the skirt has been sold to us as unisex.
And the sea isn't going to change until we men stop doing things that is only halve way done. We ourselves are part of the problem. As long we give a blind eye to the fact retailers only gives a visual that garment is for female by having female models portray in it. We men cater to that false perception it only for females when we don't leave a review about the garment how it fits and feel on our body as male customer wearing it. Plus if you add a picture showing yourself in it from neck down would be beneficial.crfriend wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:52 pmPrecisely. Until there is a sea change in men's attitude to wearing skirts and other "open ended" garments, then the whole idea will go nowhere. It's the sea change we're after -- it's not permission (we already have that, although we get singled out and occasionally harassed), it's the acceptance and uptake that will drive things. Until men -- and women -- shift their attitudes, the current state of affairs is going to persist.rivegauche wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 5:52 pmThere are social issues related to where we can wear them but that is hardly going to change because the skirt has been sold to us as unisex.
I have given reviews for skirts and dresses on Woman Within's site several times as that is where I have bought most of my clothes. I always say that I am a man and sign my first name on the review as well.mr seamstress wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 5:06 pm Bashing retailers here isn't going help us much. If we want retailers to recognize us as men buying dresses and skirts then we need become a voice of a group of buyers. This mean we need be more organize.
We can start by sending letters to Walmart home office and other retailers and demand that we men to be recognize its customer base who is buying what products to be represent as being said customer. We men need to start leaving reviews as the one who made purchase for themselves to wear instead of female.
If you want retailers to change, then we need start to making some changing on our own also. Who here is willing to give a review of dress or skirt with a picture of themselves in it?
You're leaving out the elephant in the room -- the women in our lives.mr seamstress wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 9:48 pmAnd the sea isn't going to change until we men stop doing things that is only halve way done. We ourselves are part of the problem. As long we give a blind eye to the fact retailers only gives a visual that garment is for female by having female models portray in it.
I didn't leave out the elephant in the room. I was counting on when men start posting pictures of themselves with a review that women would notice that there is men wearing the same garment she is looking at. We be having CEO's in home office of company recognizing who is buying their product and customers checking review seeing who has bought their product.crfriend wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 12:59 am
You're leaving out the elephant in the room -- the women in our lives.
Retailers are not the problem, they're merely trying to put brass in their pockets and couldn't care less who or where that brass comes from. Until men realise that they can wear open-ended garments, and until the women in our lives also accept that, men are doomed to trousers. It's going to take both before it has a chance of catching on.
The men were off fighting wars and the women were left to operate the factories, supporting the war effort.mr seamstress wrote:You have to consider what it took for man to accept women in pants.
What 'job' is available where wearing skirts/dresses are requiredmr seamstress wrote:Somewhere in there is the answer for us in getting women in accepting men in dresses and skirts just in reverse.
Your answer is more about when women started accepting wearing pants instead what it took for men accepting women in pants. Even when war was over men didn't fully accept women in pants. It was several decades later until man quit bickering about women in pants. Even in 1970"s schools prohibited females from wearing pants. I believe it had to do with when retailers saturated the market with female models with wearing pants before it sunk in man's mind that women can and have the right to wear pants, not before that.Uncle Al wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 5:33 am The men were off fighting wars and the women were left to operate the factories, supporting the war effort.What 'job' is available where wearing skirts/dresses are requiredmr seamstress wrote:Somewhere in there is the answer for us in getting women in accepting men in dresses and skirts just in reverse.
Get men to fill these jobs and, at least half of, the battle is over
Just my $.02 worth
Uncle Al