





Uncle Al



I’ve been experimenting with different skirts gotten through an online thrift shop. Any skirt that restricts my movement goes back, hate them. So I agree with her hatred of pencil skirts.Coder wrote: ↑Sat Oct 08, 2022 3:27 am Another commentary - very short - on the Virgin Atlantic policy change.
https://archive.ph/zuYXr#selection-841.104-855.296
I don't agree with her initial premise - skirts can be comfortable - but they can't be restrictive which pencil skirts are. I get the sense the article's a bit tongue in cheek.
In the context of the original thread, the pencil skirt is on offer and if a guy wishes to wear it, he is free to.
Agreed. It’s all subjective and we really should just say what you hate, I might like and what I like, you may hate. But in the end, they are opinions. Neither right or wrong and should be respected without broad generalizations that ALL anything is good or bad.Coder wrote: ↑Sat Oct 08, 2022 10:53 am I find it wholly subjective - comfort level - and dependent on what one does during the day. For instance, at work I have a standing desk. I like to perch on my stool like a bird might - with my legs tucked under me. Hard to describe... but depending on the skirt this is nearly impossible. Standing it's no issue. Wearing pants it's no issue. Additionally, parents dress their kids in horrendously awful styles - my sister suffered under such a regime - although I don't think she saw it as such. I think some of that might play into that as well.
Yep!
I would consider it - but only if it fit well. If the tailoring was off or restrictive (the skirts look really restrictive) then no. Also not sure if I'd like the pouffy shirt (could live with that though). I don't like the idea of being labeled as not-cis, but I think that just comes with the territory and you live with it. If people ask, just say "fashion freedom". Plus, since flats are allowed, no issues with footwear, though I'm not certain what that means within the confines of their uniforms.
Maybe - but wouldn't it have to be compression rated or medical hose? Seems like the basic lightweight stuff wouldn't do much to prevent vein issues.
Brad wrote: ↑Thu Nov 03, 2022 1:39 pm If you see a woman (or someone presenting as female) wearing pants, do you ask questions such as:
Are you a woman presenting as a male?
Are you a trans man?
If you are a cis-gender female, why are you wearing pants?
Are you making a statement by wearing pants?
Now turn these questions around for a man wearing a skirt. It seems that a man needs to have a REASON to wear a skirt. The reason should not matter. Let's accept people at face value.
Just curious- how many of you would wear the Virgin female uniform on the job if given the option? Or would you say "That's for trans people only and doesn't apply to cis-gender males who want to wear it."
About flight attendants in pantyhose- I've heard that pantyhose help with preventing vein issues for people on their feet and experiencing frequent altitude changes.
Given that it was crafted for the point to be more "inclusive" of the trans-* spectrum, I'd say, "No. That's the purview of the trans-* world, and I don't need that tick-box marked in HR. Had it thrown the doors wide, then possibly, but not with the way it was framed."