I can't figure out how skirts came to be considered formal wear.Shick wrote: ↑Mon Aug 29, 2022 11:25 am Myopic Bookworm wrote:
> I was in M&S recently, and they seemed to have hardly any skirts at all
> on display, whether as suits or not.
Its a post-lockdown thing. Sales of formal workwear, be it skirts of suits, has plummeted so most retailers are opting for casual wear. That means more flowy skirts and fewer structured cuts.![]()
From what I have seen in history the 1950s skirts and dresses were a every day daily wear, dressy or casual.
Of course 1950 s women didn't really have the pants option.
How in 70 years did the skirt virtually die?
I know some women that pretty much wearing any skirt is considered dressing up. How did they loose the casual so to speak?
Like every thing there is formal and casual.
I feel saddened by the attitude of alot of women that have abandoned skirt s and dresses.
This weekend, I went to a festival in a park.
Now I couldn't possibly see everyone there in the estimated crowd of 10 thousand. So I have no way of figuring out how to get a accurate sample.
But in waking around that day I did see at least 70 women in skirts, skorts and dresses.
I don't count outfits where the trousers could be clearly seen underneath the skirt. Or little girls that look to be 7 or younger figuring mommy probably dressed then and they didn't willfully choose the skirt or dress.
The 70 surprised me, either I got better at watching and spotting skirts, or more women actually were wearing them from years past.
No men in kilts or skirts spotted.
While men in skirts isn't quite commonly accepted yet. I feel like we might be heading that way.