https://nypost.com/2021/10/21/summit-ny ... g-blushes/
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Participant
I doubt that anyone would see more there than they would at the beach.Sinned wrote: ↑Wed Oct 27, 2021 6:00 pm I note that some really aren't bothered about the exposure. So why should we be overly-sensitive about exposing a flash of knicker? I would not have any objection to appearing in a skirt. If someone would really enjoy getting a view of what was under the skirt then I hope it blinds them!![]()
I did a photo shoot for a client that owned the airplane - he cut a small 6x6 inch hole in the bottom of the aircraft floor - fastened a door closing -denimini wrote: ↑Sun Oct 31, 2021 11:28 am The height of my ezperiences was in days before drones when I needed some aerial photos of a National Park. A small plane was hired and I asked the pilot if he could take the door off so I wasn't shooting through perspex. Well, it was far more windy than we expected and immediately after take off we were catching camera cases, log books and all sorts of things before they went out the door.
I found it difficult to hold the camera steady with the wind buffetting and had to put my foot out onto the wing to steady myself. To make matters worse, as not to have the wing in the frame the pilot had to bank the plane. I was busy trying to get the best shots possible but I did have a thought in the back of my mind about the reliablility of the seat belt.