Skirts and Habits.

General discussion of skirt and kilt-based fashion for men, and stuff that goes with skirts and kilts.
Grok
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 3562
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:21 am

Re: Skirts and Habits.

Post by Grok »

Regarding crfriend's robe-was the garment intended for a Jedi knight, or a very tall Jawa? :lol:
Grok
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 3562
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:21 am

Re: Skirts and Habits.

Post by Grok »

Perhaps we could use a new term-Men In Robes. Abbreviate the term as MIR. MIR would be a topic to be considered along with MIS (Men In Skirts). :D
User avatar
couyalair
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 957
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:55 pm
Location: Malaga or Grenoble

Re: Skirts and Habits.

Post by couyalair »

Grok wrote:Perhaps we could use a new term-Men In Robes. Abbreviate the term as MIR. MIR would be a topic to be considered along with MIS (Men In Skirts). :D
Except that, whereas most of the members here prefer to be completely unbifurcated, robe-wearers all seem to keep there trousers on under their long skirts. This has the drawback of making the robe a nuisance when walking, the cloth of the robe getting in the way of the trousers. I used to wear a jellaba and the only way to be comfortable when walking was with hands in pockets to hold it away from the legs. Sometimes, I'd hitch it up to free my legs.
I don't know how monks (used to) dress themselves (ie : what was under their robes?), but since trousers had not been invented in the middle ages, I suppose they would be unbifurcated.

I feel that MIR (adding a layer of cloth) and MIS (substituting one garment for another) are two quite different things.


Martin
Grok
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 3562
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:21 am

Re: Skirts and Habits.

Post by Grok »

I didn't realize that. :shock: Why wear a robe if you are going to wear trousers underneath? What's the point?
User avatar
crfriend
Master Barista
Posts: 15298
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: New England (U.S.)
Contact:

Re: Skirts and Habits.

Post by crfriend »

Grok wrote:Why wear a robe if you are going to wear trousers underneath? What's the point?
In my case, it was down to local convention. The robe I had wasn't floor-length and to not be wearing trousers would have been jarring to the onlookers and I wasn't interested in that sort of thing at the time.

Nice quip about the Jawas. :wink: That's a term I still use to describe scrap-dealers who have no idea about the history of what they're melting down. I most definitely use it as a pejorative, however I did not take the above comment so. (In fact, I actually got a laugh out of it.)
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
Grok
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 3562
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:21 am

Re: Skirts and Habits.

Post by Grok »

I'm glad that my Jawa joke was entertaining. "Convention"? Well, that sort of explains it. A convention-such as Trousers Tyrany-may be deeply entrenched, even if it doesn't make sense.
Grok
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 3562
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:21 am

Re: Skirts and Habits.

Post by Grok »

If the Space Rug is a new product, then there should be no established rules/conventions. No requirement to wear trousers if you are relaxing at home.
Finnkilt
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:07 pm

Re: Skirts and Habits.

Post by Finnkilt »

When I was visiting a monastery not so long ago, one of the brothers asked for a photo to be taken of him in his habit with me in my 'mini-habit' (Elkommando hiking kilt). :D
Post Reply