Are some of you deliberately missing Stu's point? A mainstream retailer says that this skirt is unisex.
Where have you ever seen that before? A mainstream retailer says that this skirt is unisex.
Yes, it's short, too short for most guys who have posted on this thread, but some of our younger or more daring members wear skirts that length. If skirts are to become normal menswear, young guys are going to have to wear them - where better to start than in a skirt that a mainstream retailer says is unisex?
The hem is "distressed", which is so "last year" that even Marks & Spencer don't do it any more, but a mainstream retailer says that this skirt is unisex.
If you wore it and went commando, you'd get arrested for indecent exposure, but nobody is suggesting that you do: the model is wearing fairly thick tights and she has less to hide than you or me under this skirt that a mainstream retailer says is unisex.
It's expensive for what it is, and you could easily find one pretty much the same, a lot cheaper. But this one is ground-breaking: a mainstream retailer says that this skirt is unisex!
The only model in the picture is female, but a mainstream retailer says that this skirt is unisex. No doubt some women will mention it to their male friends, and some of them may just decide to give it a go and conclude that this skirt
is unisex.
Oh, and one other thing, that I think Stu might have overlooked. The most amazing thing about this is it must just be a sign of things to come: a mainstream retailer says that this skirt is unisex!
Denim can have that effect on our sensibilities! -but there is a market for it, and if some young men take to wearing denim skirts then it could have a positive long-term effect on making skirts in other materials more "acceptable".
