

The problem was that the original thread had become so polluted that all its original context had been lost, and woe be it to the poor sod who started reading it hoping for something relevant or on-topic for this forum. Quite honestly I thought seriously of binning the whole thing, but decided to entomb it instead so the fearless might derive some germs of interest from it and also get a taste of how political discussions cannot be carried on in a civil manner in an uncivilised society.Fred in Skirts wrote:I really don't see the reason for locking the thread as the political crap was moved to another area.Oh well I am not a moderator and have no say in the matter.
The problem is that no matter how hard we try, we're awash in this mess. Try jumping into the local sewage-treatment-facility primary-tanks sometime and not coming away without smelling like cr@p. Some revel in it, and some are appalled -- and never the twain shall meet. Once belief creeps in, intellect leaves by the back door and civility goes out the window.This is a forum for those of us that wear skirts and dresses.
The trick is to recall that you're actually talking to another human being, albeit one who has a different viewpoint than you, and that civility in the face of disagreement counts for something. The big problem is not the disagreement, the big problem is a lack of civil behaviour.moonshadow wrote:As has been pretty well illustrated, I'm not particularly good at political discussions. I weigh in from time to time, and normally wind up with my foot in my mouth or worse, completely pissed off.
Individuals may -- and likely do -- take you seriously, but what of society as a whole? I don't think the notion translates very well in what passes for here.Pdxfashionpioneer wrote:I have to respectfully disagree with you. Plenty of people take me seriously when I'm in a skirt or dress.
In what dimension of "alternate facts" do you dwell? I'd like to join you.And the average individual counts for plenty in politics.
The oligarchs don't care; they're completely unaffected by it. Trump doesn't care; he started the thing and fed off an inarticulate frenzy to put the thing in place. The only folks who care are either the ones directly affected by it (and I have concerns about a very good friend of mine in this regard if he decides to visit his family back in Iran -- and he's lived here since before the fall of the Shah) or the bleeding hearts who understand that silence is assent -- and they're all Little People so their voices do not matter. The only way that the oligarchs will demand an end to it is if they start feeling the pinch in their bank statements.All of those demonstrations world-wide against the travel ban has gotten the political party's attention and for that matter, Donald Trump's. So far it's only pissed him off [...]
Al nuked it while I was -- yet again -- providing references and citations (which quite clearly haven't been read) to drive the point home which Dave seems unable to understand. Al was understandably and considerably torqued off about Dave's recent behaviour of "calling people out". That's fine in old oaters [0] but is not acceptable behaviour in polite society. Suggestions have been mooted and conversation is taking place amongst the members of the moderation team as to what to do about this problem.moonshadow wrote:Dave, not sure what happened to your reply....