to warm you

[Mipi]

error in lonk

[Mipi]

error in link. I have problems in posting pic.

If you take a look in Neckemann WWW, product for her, there are pantihose which are lest then knee hight long.
When I found out how to post pic. or link properly will be back

Regards!

[Mipi]

See attachment.

[Pythos]

I find these very ironic.

Women supposedly hate pantyhose because they are uncomfortable, but they love to wear Spanx or other items that are essentially TIGHTER versions of the part of the pantyhose they supposedly hate.

Another funny thing, the same women insist on wearing something under their pantyhose, yet when they wear this control type underwear, they wear it as underwear. It is exactly the same garment, just one lacks the bottom legs and feet.

I may buy a set to see if my conclusions are correct they may be rather comfy.

[Uncle Al]

Pythos,

I'm unable to find the website. Would you post
what/where you've found the info?

Thanks!

Uncle Al

[cessna152towser]

Appears to defeat the whole freedom of a kilt or skirt if you are going to wear pantyhose under, pantyhose is just like a thin and very tight trouser. A knee length wool kilt with knee socks should be fine for colder weather.

[Peter v]

Appears to defeat the whole freedom of a kilt or skirt if you are going to wear pantyhose under, pantyhose is just like a thin and very tight trouser. A knee length wool kilt with knee socks should be fine for colder weather.

Although that argument seems to have merrit, It all depends very much on why you wear skirts.

As some suggest, all men would be better off wearing skirts only. Very puritan, but ok. No underwear at all. This may be ok for some, but others choose to wear at least underpants under their skirt.

When men are not into all out health, ( shouldn't drive motor vehicles, etc either..... instead ride bycicles, walk.....) and have chosen to purely exchange their pants for the skirt there are other arguments for what to wear underneath.

In THAT context, there is no discussion about health issues. Especially if the man in question would rather not have active sperm anyway any more... ( which, a healthy sperm count, is I believe one of the arguments for not wearing any underclothing at all )

So then why not wear comfortable panty hose or the like? Of course, everything we wear should not be "too" anything, especially not "too tight".

I still have a suspicion that some members would rather there not be any discussion to credit the wearing of pantyhose and the like, as being a femme article. But I may be wrong in that assumption. They may be made essentially for the women market, but are certainly not a woman only garment.

And I am not even mentioning the choice of wearing nylons, panty hose, hold ups for looks........

[Mipi]

I agree that this type of underwear can be very tight. But my problem is somewhere else. My kidneys are causing some problems to me and I have to have them warm. I used to wear kidney warmer, but they are to much in normal everyday situations. So this is a sort of compromise for me; warm yet not hot and stays in place much more stabile then any kidney warmer I know.

As usual,it depends on wearer and situation.

Regards!


Mipi