Kilt wear shop for men
Kilt wear shop for men
Check out Guilty -- New Age Kilt Wear. They have a shop on the 2nd floor of Kingly Court, which is just off Carnaby Street in London W1.
http://www.guiltykilts.com
I went by their shop yesterday and it had some great stuff. I was in a hurry and couldn't stop for long, but the place is well worth a visit. Maybe not the cheapest, but you've got to support these new places, if we want to see more of them.
The only down side which dismayed me a little was the photos on their website which seemed to be of Gay Pride in Paris, Brighton and London, 2004. I was shocked because I didn't think the kilt was a gay icon, and I really hope it doesn't become one!
http://www.guiltykilts.com
I went by their shop yesterday and it had some great stuff. I was in a hurry and couldn't stop for long, but the place is well worth a visit. Maybe not the cheapest, but you've got to support these new places, if we want to see more of them.
The only down side which dismayed me a little was the photos on their website which seemed to be of Gay Pride in Paris, Brighton and London, 2004. I was shocked because I didn't think the kilt was a gay icon, and I really hope it doesn't become one!
The only thing man cannot endure is meaninglessness.
-
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:24 am
Well, I'd guess from the 'about us' information on that website that the two guys who run that business are gay. I don't see that as important in any way - but it looks as if they are trying to aim their marketing at the potential gay customer.The only down side which dismayed me a little was the photos on their website which seemed to be of Gay Pride in Paris, Brighton and London, 2004. I was shocked because I didn't think the kilt was a gay icon, and I really hope it doesn't become one!
I think most people would guess that there was a gay interest there. I mean . . . a furry kilt? . . . a PVC kilt? . . . an ultra low waisted kilt? That's just a little bit . . . unusual, isn't it?

Nevertheless, there are some nice looking kilts there. I like the look of one of the Camo ones. Bit expensive though. Still - good luck to them. As far as I am concerned, the more men who wear skirts of kilts the better. I don't care if they are gay or dull. Doesn't worry me.
It's never too late to have a happy childhood . . .
-
- Active Member
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 4:23 am
- Location: D/FW Metroplex TX
- Contact:
I wouldn't worry too much about it being marketed towards gay men. Many fashions have been pushed forward for all of us by gay men. If they (gay men) are the boldest and get things more accepted for us all then I think it's a good thing.
Freedom since July 3, 2004.
Genius can be recreated - Stupidity is irreplaceable. -The Satirist 2004-
Genius can be recreated - Stupidity is irreplaceable. -The Satirist 2004-
Cannot say I agree with that!The Satirist wrote:I wouldn't worry too much about it being marketed towards gay men. Many fashions have been pushed forward for all of us by gay men. If they (gay men) are the boldest and get things more accepted for us all then I think it's a good thing.

-
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:24 am
People don't 'chose' a homosexual lifestyle - any more than a person might 'choose' a heterosexual lifestyle. To the best of my understanding, a persons' sexuality is simply an aspect of who they are - it is not a matter for choice.I really would not like to folk perceive a mistaken connection between homosexual behaviour and Kilt wearing. As I've mentioned before, we have several friends who have chosen a homosexual lifestyle - that's their personal business - but none of them would dream of wearing Kilts, let alone skirts!
If a possible perceived connection between homosexuality and kilt wearing is mistaken - as you rightly say - then why worry about it? If we start to worry about all of the mistaken perceptions that may arise when people see a man in a kilt or a skirt - like: "he's gay; he's a crossdresser; he's a transvestite; he's a pervert; he's Scottish; he's a show-off; he's drunk . . . etc." - then we would probably never go out of the front door!
It's never too late to have a happy childhood . . .
At one time, I was perhaps willing to believe that that was indeed the case. I have always had a 'built-in' curiosity above, well, almost everything and, in particular, People, intrigue me. I grew up, more in the company of animals, birds, etc., until I was five. Their 'designed' instinct is to be heterosexual - so, surprisingly, are Humans! So People were a new challenge to 'interpret'. There were/are certain 'key' factors that constantly re-occur(ed) amongst the (homosexual) folk I knew that I first dismissed as 'chance'. 50+ years on, those factors have remained pretty much constant.Christopher wrote:People don't 'chose' a homosexual lifestyle - any more than a person might 'choose' a heterosexual lifestyle. To the best of my understanding, a persons' sexuality is simply an aspect of who they are - it is not a matter for choice.
That's the point, sadly - many folk don't get past the front door, either physically or mentally. I find the media-led mis-conceptions at best irritating, at worst manipulative, as to what "Society" 'thinks' (about most things, if we're honest!). It's just that when the time-wearied cliches stagger onto the news/masgazine pages/TV, it seemily re-inforces irrational prejudices.Christopher wrote:If a possible perceived connection between homosexuality and kilt wearing is mistaken - as you rightly say - then why worry about it? If we start to worry about all of the mistaken perceptions that may arise when people see a man in a kilt or a skirt - like: "he's gay; he's a crossdresser; he's a transvestite; he's a pervert; he's Scottish; he's a show-off; he's drunk . . . etc." - then we would probably never go out of the front door!
hmm, shouldn't that be, "at best manipulative, at worst irritating" ?
I mean, manipulative stuff, we can all shrug off, but if something is irritating, it must have already got to us. therefore, I'd say irritating is the worst-case scenario, but manipulative would be the best-case scenario, in this best-case, worst-case scenario comparison.
best-case/worst-case comparisons can be confusing at best, annoyingly complex at worst, as they turn a simple thing into something requiring a bit of think-through, but after I worked this one out, it surprised me! perhaps we can all do our bit by keeping to an accepted standard. what does everyone else think?
I agree that being seen as gay is one more tag stuck on a skirt that we can do without. that said, they did have some nice kilts in there, and they were real friendly! so i still will get something from there to support them.
I mean, manipulative stuff, we can all shrug off, but if something is irritating, it must have already got to us. therefore, I'd say irritating is the worst-case scenario, but manipulative would be the best-case scenario, in this best-case, worst-case scenario comparison.
best-case/worst-case comparisons can be confusing at best, annoyingly complex at worst, as they turn a simple thing into something requiring a bit of think-through, but after I worked this one out, it surprised me! perhaps we can all do our bit by keeping to an accepted standard. what does everyone else think?
I agree that being seen as gay is one more tag stuck on a skirt that we can do without. that said, they did have some nice kilts in there, and they were real friendly! so i still will get something from there to support them.
The only thing man cannot endure is meaninglessness.
- Skirt Chaser
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 7:28 pm
- Location: North America
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:54 am
who cares ?
who cares if kilts are for gay or straight ????
You mentioned guilty kilts, and they don t make any secret about making FASHIONABLE kilts, for men either gay or straight !!!!!!!!!!
So it s your OWN choice to wear them or not.

You mentioned guilty kilts, and they don t make any secret about making FASHIONABLE kilts, for men either gay or straight !!!!!!!!!!
So it s your OWN choice to wear them or not.

-
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 7:03 am
- Location: West Midlands, England, UK
Some of them look quite good; some look cheap.
I'll probably pass - they are a little flimsy for me in terms of kilts - I prefer to pay full whack and get the real thing. If it's less than £250, I start to worry about corners being cut, although I admit that by moving away from trad kilt material and design, one has rather more scope for managing the price.
Put another way, £120 for some of the better kilts seems like decent value to me.
I'll probably pass - they are a little flimsy for me in terms of kilts - I prefer to pay full whack and get the real thing. If it's less than £250, I start to worry about corners being cut, although I admit that by moving away from trad kilt material and design, one has rather more scope for managing the price.
Put another way, £120 for some of the better kilts seems like decent value to me.