One woman's reaction to a MIS
-
Since1982
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 3449
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:13 pm
- Location: My BUTT is Living in the USA, and sitting on the tip of the Sky Needle, Ow Ow Ow!!. Get the POINT?
Marry her..
Good idea, take her out in public and watch her pull peoples skirts and pants and clothing off for a while, then take her to the Nut Bin...and leave her there..:rolleyes:
I had to remove this signature as it was being used on Twitter. This is my OPINION, you NEEDN'T AGREE.
Story of Life, Perspire, Expire, Funeral Pyre!I've been skirted part time since 1972 and full time since 2005. http://skirts4men.myfreeforum.org/
Story of Life, Perspire, Expire, Funeral Pyre!I've been skirted part time since 1972 and full time since 2005. http://skirts4men.myfreeforum.org/
I tend to agree that women are more aggressive when they let their hair down a bit. In 1987-88 I was privileged to be a participant in the World Scout Jamboree as a member of the Catering Corps for all the assembled world Commissioners in our own sub camp.(Bloody hard work) I can remember one of the cub leaders attaching a fair size makeup mirror to the end of a broomstick and, whensome of the Scottish Commissioners came in, she was headed in their direction with the clear intention of seeing just what they wore under their kilts. B.T.W. possibly from bitter experience, they were too quick and she failed. I, however, was envious of their kilts.
-
Skirt Chaser
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 7:28 pm
- Location: North America
Sarongman, what that woman did was disgraceful, particularly as she is supposed to be setting an example to the boys in her troop! Men do get a bad reputation as the troublemaking ones but there sure are enough women that share the title. Did you get a chance to see how others were reacting to that incident? I hope somebody gave her a long lecture about respect.
Quiet Mouse
Quiet Mouse
Worse still, one of our commissioners was bragging how he slipped some alcohol into a muslim commissioner's drink. The victim was a gentle man who would have been appalled at the abuse of trust!-
Skirt Chaser
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 7:28 pm
- Location: North America
Those people probably don't even have a conscience about the 'jokes' they play meanwhile there are great, harmless guys who wear skirts and may wonder if they are doing something wrong. 
Time to throw my hat into the ring on a few of the many points that came up.
Firstly, on the main topic. It seems that, for better or worse, there is a double standard. If a girl gets a bit "frisky", even in public, it's "ok." But if a guy were to do the same thing, he'd get into trouble. Also, it's ok to ask what's worn under a skirt to a guy...even by another guy. But ask such a question to a girl...well....it ain't pretty. Ideally, this would stop. But, for now, we have an uphill battle.
The next point is about what to wear under a skirt (or in my case, sarong), without getting risque. On a couple of occasions, friends suggested what to wear underneath. A female friend I once had mentioned tights. Ain't my style. And a guy friend laughed about bicycle shorts being useful under a sarong. Nope. Again, not my style. All I need to say is that I'm quite competent and good and comfortable at wrapping sarongs on. Now, it seems that, in the past couple of decades, two things has happened. a)wearing pants of some sort with a skirt or dress. More common among women. Some say it may be influence from the Middle East and India, where the "Salwar-Kamiz" (Salwar = pants/trousers, Kamiz = loose tunic) is worn by some women. b)bicycle shorts, sometimes visibly displayed, beneath a skirt. It was a brief fad in the 80's. Now it's been ressurected. One thing, it seems to be quite common/popular in Japan. And at anime conventions/events, at least one girl is usually wearing a short dress or skirt with visible bicycle shorts. And in anime and video games, it seems to be more and more common. And because they're quite big, of course it's percolating here. Personally, I'm not much of a fan of the pants or bicycle shorts visible beneath a skirt, but....whatever works for them!
Now, about children. There was a time when children were considered a symbol of innocence. There was even a time (and in some parts of the world, still is) when children being naked was considered ok, not something sick or twisted, or a "pedophile magnet." Of course, there are variations, but, sadly...at some point in the 80's, there was a big scare, even "witch hunts", anyone who was male and worked with children was considered a potential pedophile. And until 2001, it seemed, the biggest fear that was being talked about on the news all the time were those who preyed on children. But even today many girls do get away with just wearing panties beneath their dresses or skirts, most of the time. I've seen a flash, and just...don't make a deal about it. And even before the 80's there were sleaze...ever listened to the song "Aqualung"? "Eyeing little girls with bad intents" and "watching as the frilly panties run by" (I assume this meant girls in dresses who were running so quickly that intertia and air resistance causes it to "whip up.") However, there are some people who insist that they should be wearing either bloomers or shorts....or even bicycle shorts. I've seen pages about school dress codes, a few places, MOSTLY those with a religious connection (but not always) will say something like "Bloomers or shorts must be worn underneath if wearing a skirt or dress," or even "Black Bicycle shorts must be worn underneath if wearing..." and even specifying a specific style. Personally, my opinion is, they're children, as long as they're adequately covered, let's not go overboard and get paranoid. And burdening children with "paranoias" at a young age is not the way to go. Ok, it's just my $0.02, but, I'm saying what I'm saying. If we get to paranoid....it mostly works against us. And it would eventually "demonize" wearing skirts/dresses by anyone, which would not be a good thing. However, at the same time....it's also wrong to jokingly try to "inspect" total strangers like that girl with the mirror apparently wanted to do for the kilted Scouts. Especially someone in a position of authority.
~Ra'akone
Firstly, on the main topic. It seems that, for better or worse, there is a double standard. If a girl gets a bit "frisky", even in public, it's "ok." But if a guy were to do the same thing, he'd get into trouble. Also, it's ok to ask what's worn under a skirt to a guy...even by another guy. But ask such a question to a girl...well....it ain't pretty. Ideally, this would stop. But, for now, we have an uphill battle.
The next point is about what to wear under a skirt (or in my case, sarong), without getting risque. On a couple of occasions, friends suggested what to wear underneath. A female friend I once had mentioned tights. Ain't my style. And a guy friend laughed about bicycle shorts being useful under a sarong. Nope. Again, not my style. All I need to say is that I'm quite competent and good and comfortable at wrapping sarongs on. Now, it seems that, in the past couple of decades, two things has happened. a)wearing pants of some sort with a skirt or dress. More common among women. Some say it may be influence from the Middle East and India, where the "Salwar-Kamiz" (Salwar = pants/trousers, Kamiz = loose tunic) is worn by some women. b)bicycle shorts, sometimes visibly displayed, beneath a skirt. It was a brief fad in the 80's. Now it's been ressurected. One thing, it seems to be quite common/popular in Japan. And at anime conventions/events, at least one girl is usually wearing a short dress or skirt with visible bicycle shorts. And in anime and video games, it seems to be more and more common. And because they're quite big, of course it's percolating here. Personally, I'm not much of a fan of the pants or bicycle shorts visible beneath a skirt, but....whatever works for them!
Now, about children. There was a time when children were considered a symbol of innocence. There was even a time (and in some parts of the world, still is) when children being naked was considered ok, not something sick or twisted, or a "pedophile magnet." Of course, there are variations, but, sadly...at some point in the 80's, there was a big scare, even "witch hunts", anyone who was male and worked with children was considered a potential pedophile. And until 2001, it seemed, the biggest fear that was being talked about on the news all the time were those who preyed on children. But even today many girls do get away with just wearing panties beneath their dresses or skirts, most of the time. I've seen a flash, and just...don't make a deal about it. And even before the 80's there were sleaze...ever listened to the song "Aqualung"? "Eyeing little girls with bad intents" and "watching as the frilly panties run by" (I assume this meant girls in dresses who were running so quickly that intertia and air resistance causes it to "whip up.") However, there are some people who insist that they should be wearing either bloomers or shorts....or even bicycle shorts. I've seen pages about school dress codes, a few places, MOSTLY those with a religious connection (but not always) will say something like "Bloomers or shorts must be worn underneath if wearing a skirt or dress," or even "Black Bicycle shorts must be worn underneath if wearing..." and even specifying a specific style. Personally, my opinion is, they're children, as long as they're adequately covered, let's not go overboard and get paranoid. And burdening children with "paranoias" at a young age is not the way to go. Ok, it's just my $0.02, but, I'm saying what I'm saying. If we get to paranoid....it mostly works against us. And it would eventually "demonize" wearing skirts/dresses by anyone, which would not be a good thing. However, at the same time....it's also wrong to jokingly try to "inspect" total strangers like that girl with the mirror apparently wanted to do for the kilted Scouts. Especially someone in a position of authority.
~Ra'akone