skirtilator wrote:If you follow to the root of the cause of the outrage you'll end up with people's shitty childhood experience, as Stefan Molyneux stated. These reactions aren't normal.
Well, the reactions
could be considered normal
if the majority of children had lousy "childhood experiences"; however, I would tend to speculate that most folks
didn't have uniformly dour formative years so I suspect that there's something else in play.
From personal experience, and observations of a few other people, I can honestly (if not, perhaps in the truest sense, factually) say that the more a child is encouraged to be actively curious about the world around them when they're very young -- and to trust their experiences in making decisions -- then one winds up with open-minded adults who feel free to question "received wisdom" in many areas and perhaps not be so judgmental as those who had the "received wisdom" beaten into them as children.
As far as the other poster's comment about Western "welfare states" goes, I'd like to point up that humans band into civilisations and states to look after the safety of those belonging to the state. This keeps the "Law of the Jungle" from reigning supreme and allows more members of the society to contribute in meaningful and creative ways than would otherwise be the case. Following that logic, there should be some form of "lower bound" beneath which people are not allowed to fall (this used to be known as the "safety-net"); this is nothing more than humanity looking after itself (recall that societies do not function without some level of altruism). Some societies understand this; tragically, some do not.