Let's never speak this word again

Discussion of fashion elements and looks that are traditionally considered somewhat "femme" but are presented in a masculine context. This is NOT about transvestism or crossdressing.
rode_kater
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 840
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2019 10:46 pm

Re: Let's never speak this word again

Post by rode_kater »

phathack wrote: Mon Jul 03, 2023 10:37 pm For me, a Cross-Dresser is one who tries to appear as a woman.
I think it's more subtle than that: a cross-dresser is someone who wears clothes they consider belonging to the opposite gender. Some try to pass as the opposite gender, but many do not. See the /r/crossdressing survey results page 8, significant minority is not interested in passing.

The difference with us (IMO) is that we don't consider the clothing to belong to the opposite gender, it's our clothes, we bought them. So the difference is entirely in the state of mind, and crucially, there is no way for an outside observer to distinguish between a us and cross-dressers.
User avatar
crfriend
Master Barista
Posts: 14500
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: New England (U.S.)
Contact:

Re: Let's never speak this word again

Post by crfriend »

rode_kater wrote: Tue Jul 04, 2023 9:43 pm[...]See the /r/crossdressing survey results page 8, significant minority is not interested in passing.
What say we stop using that term as well as it's a one-way street to a clinical diagnosis -- which can only apply to men. Since "transvestism" and "crossdressing" are precisely the same thing (the former is a tarted-up and Latinized transliteration of the latter it makes sense to walk away from both and be done with.

I noted with some hilarity there, "a significant minority" (i.e. those of us making style choices for the sake of style) remain a "significant minority". Not good.
The difference with us (IMO) is that we don't consider the clothing to belong to the opposite gender, it's our clothes, we bought them. So the difference is entirely in the state of mind, and crucially, there is no way for an outside observer to distinguish between a us and cross-dressers.
That's not what the DSM still says, and until that damned thing gets fixed we're stuck. The interim answer is to ditch the terms -- both.
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
User avatar
denimini
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 3244
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 2:50 am
Location: Outback Australia

Re: Let's never speak this word again

Post by denimini »

Just say it is a person's own individual style. Boxes are only for dead people.
Anthony, a denim miniskirt wearer in Outback Australia
User avatar
JohnH
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 1043
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:46 am
Location: Irving, Texas USA

Re: Let's never speak this word again

Post by JohnH »

phathack wrote: Mon Jul 03, 2023 10:37 pm For me, a Cross-Dresser is one who tries to appear as a woman.
A cross dresser almost always takes on a feminine name. Even though I have a feminine appearance thanks to the estrogen I have been on for 12 years, I still regard myself as a man as I have XY chromosomes. Hence I NEVER use a feminine name, even for crossdressers.com or femulate.org. One thing that is definitely not feminine: my voice that borders on basso profundo. In my current church choir I have sung Db2 below the bass staff.

John
User avatar
greenboots
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 422
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2017 9:50 pm
Location: West Wickham, SE London

Re: Let's never speak this word again

Post by greenboots »

JohnH wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 2:29 am One thing that is definitely not feminine: my voice that borders on basso profundo. In my current church choir I have sung Db2 below the bass staff.

John
For me an F is comfortable and an Eb just possible with a good warm up, deep breath and a prayer 🙏 :)
jamie001
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 345
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:09 am

Re: Let's never speak this word again

Post by jamie001 »

JohnH wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 2:29 am
phathack wrote: Mon Jul 03, 2023 10:37 pm For me, a Cross-Dresser is one who tries to appear as a woman.
A cross dresser almost always takes on a feminine name. Even though I have a feminine appearance thanks to the estrogen I have been on for 12 years, I still regard myself as a man as I have XY chromosomes. Hence I NEVER use a feminine name, even for crossdressers.com or femulate.org. One thing that is definitely not feminine: my voice that borders on basso profundo. In my current church choir I have sung Db2 below the bass staff.

John
In my case the good thing for me is that I already have a feminine name which is fine although sometimes I wish that I had been named "Nancy" because I really love the name. Also it is important to acknowledge that by society's standards we are all crossdressers here. I hate the "T" word, but accept that I am a feminine crossdresser.
User avatar
Myopic Bookworm
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 9:12 pm
Location: SW England (Cotswolds)

Re: Let's never speak this word again

Post by Myopic Bookworm »

greenboots wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 2:46 pm
JohnH wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 2:29 am One thing that is definitely not feminine: my voice that borders on basso profundo. In my current church choir I have sung Db2 below the bass staff.

John
For me an F is comfortable and an Eb just possible with a good warm up, deep breath and a prayer 🙏 :)
I once had to have a vodka on the way to sing Rachmaninov in a concert, so that I had a better chance of getting some sound on the bottom Db.
Brad
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 247
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:54 pm
Location: Rockland County, New York, USA

Re: Let's never speak this word again

Post by Brad »

When I urged people to never use the word "transvestite" ever again, I had overlooked one acceptable usage- and that is from the 1975 film The Rocky Horror Picture Show. The character Frank-N-Furter, played by Tim Curry, sings "I'm just a sweet transvestite, from transexual Transylvania A-uh."
STEVIE
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 4246
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 11:01 pm
Location: North East Scotland.

Re: Let's never speak this word again

Post by STEVIE »

Just like our struggles to wear skirts or dresses as freely as women the use of words like transvestite, tranny or any other in any language is not ours to command.
Sure we can agree that they are not acceptable here, not use them ourselves but society is outside our remit.
Try to educate, get militant and vocal, we shall see change or maybe our grandchildren will.
Steve.
User avatar
crfriend
Master Barista
Posts: 14500
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: New England (U.S.)
Contact:

Re: Let's never speak this word again

Post by crfriend »

STEVIE wrote: Sat Jul 15, 2023 6:55 amJust like our struggles to wear skirts or dresses as freely as women the use of words like transvestite, tranny or any other in any language is not ours to command.
Strictly speaking, Steve is entirely correct here -- we do not call the shots when it comes to the use of language. However, we can set a good example by avoiding certain terms and speaking up when we hear them used by others -- and not being shrill or whiny when speaking out. When speaking out, we should speak softly, and with care and diligence.
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
User avatar
JeffB1959
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 2242
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:19 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Let's never speak this word again

Post by JeffB1959 »

JohnH wrote: Sun Jul 02, 2023 8:01 pm Perhaps instead of using terms such as "transvestite" (Latin form) or "crossdresser" (English form) the term "freestyler" needs to be used and the use needs to be encouraged.

John
That is the term I use, and, for me, I find it to be fitting.
I don't want to LOOK like a woman, I just want to DRESS like a woman.
User avatar
JohnH
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 1043
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:46 am
Location: Irving, Texas USA

Re: Let's never speak this word again

Post by JohnH »

greenboots wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 2:46 pm
JohnH wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 2:29 am One thing that is definitely not feminine: my voice that borders on basso profundo. In my current church choir I have sung Db2 below the bass staff.
For me an F is comfortable and an Eb just possible with a good warm up, deep breath and a prayer 🙏 :)
When I get up in the morning with my vocal cords relaxed I can hit G1 below the bass staff (3 ledger lines).

John
User avatar
greenboots
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 422
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2017 9:50 pm
Location: West Wickham, SE London

Re: Let's never speak this word again

Post by greenboots »

JohnH wrote: Sat Jul 15, 2023 2:49 pm
greenboots wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 2:46 pm
JohnH wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 2:29 am One thing that is definitely not feminine: my voice that borders on basso profundo. In my current church choir I have sung Db2 below the bass staff.
For me an F is comfortable and an Eb just possible with a good warm up, deep breath and a prayer 🙏 :)
When I get up in the morning with my vocal cords relaxed I can hit G1 below the bass staff (3 ledger lines).

John
I can get down there too - on a bass trombone :P
User avatar
JeffB1959
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 2242
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:19 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Let's never speak this word again

Post by JeffB1959 »

Sadly, I can't sing, not even in the shower, and the only musical instrument I can play is the kazoo! :lol:
I don't want to LOOK like a woman, I just want to DRESS like a woman.
mr seamstress
Active Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2024 4:49 am

Re: Let's never speak this word again

Post by mr seamstress »

Many will respond with "But pants are designed for women", "Shirts are designed for women"...
Women wearing pants did not occur, in America, until Katharine Hepburn wore them off a movie set
back in the 1940s-50s. During WW2, when women replaced men in the factories, the women wore
pants during their work hours but had to change back into dresses/skirts when leaving the factories.

Also back in the 1940's-50's women put dresses on infant boys. Also women also subject to arrest up to including 1970 for wearing pants.
Dresses where considered as being unisex clothing for infants up to including 1950's. Also during that same time periods clergy was claiming men can't wear dresses and women wear pants, while he had a new infant son in a pink dress.
Post Reply