Page 1 of 2
The missing link ??
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2015 3:06 pm
by denimini
Riding pants.
Looks like a retro version of the inception of bifurcation
Convertable; although I don't fully understand the process - may be just ends up like a long skort.
http://www.steampunkemporium.com/store/002782S.php
Re: The missing link ??
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2015 9:35 pm
by Sinned
Looks like a variation on culottes doesn't it? I can see the appeal of the look but can't see me wearing it. Hmmmm, MOH goes on about trousers being for men but I wonder what she would say if I obtained a plain, say dark blue, culottes and threatened to wear them? After all they're basically trousers aren't they? Perhaps not. Anyway I would probably feel sillier in them than in a skirt. Thanks for this contribution dnmmn.
Re: The missing link ??
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2015 11:45 pm
by denimini
Yes, culottes was the term I was trying to think of. Certainly a bit silly for a man to wear pants that look like a skirt instead of a skirt.
Re: The missing link ??
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 3:37 am
by skirted_in_SF
According to an article in the
Wall Street Journal today, culottes are the coming thing for the next couple of seasons.

Re: The missing link ??
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:43 pm
by Sinned
For men or women?
Re: The missing link ??
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 6:04 pm
by Caultron
The WSJ is primarily about women's fashion:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/keep-your-c ... 1426700862
But the second reader comment notes that basketball players are, in effect, wearing culottes (and leggings) already.
http://aknextphase.com/culottes-march-madness/
Re: The missing link ??
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 12:45 am
by denimini
If culottes become fashionable for men, then there is not as much difference visually to a skirt. Then a smaller step for skirts to become fashionable for men - not that I am worried about fashion but it would reduce my anxiety about wearing a skirt in public. May be it would not be as "character building" then.
The first WSJ article mentions they are cooler to wear (I assume in thermal terms) - They wouldn't be as cool as a skirt of similar material, so it seems a backward step for women in warm weather.
Re: The missing link ??
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 1:26 am
by skirtyscot
denimini wrote:Certainly a bit silly for a man to wear pants that look like a skirt instead of a skirt.
Why so? No fashion police here!
They could be a staging-post. Wear the culottes, safe in the knowledge that they are trousers (sort of). Decide you like the way they swing. Grow a pair and buy a maxi skirt. Just follow steps one, two and three!
Re: The missing link ??
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 2:30 am
by crfriend
I have a couple of (not long enough) palazzo pants which I now regard as "split skirts" (aka "long culottes"). I treat them as skirts and get on with life. I like them, but have another pair of palazzos in need of hemming, and those will be done at, or near, "maxi" length.
However, before that project can begin there are several intermediaries that need to be worked out -- else I'll have to farm the job to somebody who can carry it out well...
Re: The missing link ??
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:14 am
by denimini
skirtyscot wrote:denimini wrote:Certainly a bit silly for a man to wear pants that look like a skirt instead of a skirt.
Why so? No fashion police here!
They could be a staging-post. Wear the culottes, safe in the knowledge that they are trousers (sort of). Decide you like the way they swing. Grow a pair and buy a maxi skirt. Just follow steps one, two and three!
Yes, a staging post; only if culottes became fashionable and accepted for men.
Otherwise, I don't think I would feel any more confident wearing these in public knowing that they are really pants than I would with a skirt. I may as well just jump straight to step three.
I am sorry if I didn't get my original point across very well.
Re: The missing link ??
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 7:49 pm
by Ralph
A recent Simpsons episode had the kids at school playing a game in which they had to crawl between each other's legs. Milhouse looked down and commented sadly, "I guess I chose the wrong day to wear culottes." I have to agree with Bart's reply, EVERY day is the wrong day to wear culottes.

Although having said that this is clearly just a regular pleated skirt, and not culottes at all. You go, Milhouse!
Re: The missing link ??
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 9:27 am
by Sinned
Funnily though there was an article in the Yorkshire Post Magazine dated 21st March stating that Culottes are THE trouser shape of spring and summer!
Re: The missing link ??
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:13 am
by crfriend
We may slag off on the style of culottes, but which style is more flattering to the average human form -- culottes or skin-tight leggings or jeans?
Re: The missing link ??
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 3:19 pm
by Caultron
crfriend wrote:We may slag off on the style of culottes, but which style is more flattering to the average human form -- culottes or skin-tight leggings or jeans?
Well, if you have a shape worth flattering, I'd say skin-tight looks best. Like, if you got it, flaunt it.
The issue with culottes seems to be that we favor skirts: full-blown, unbifurcated, single-leghole skirts. For us, pants that look like skirts simply won't do.
But why wouldn't we want other men to wear culottes? I guess because we'd rather have them wear skirts, like us. But if the look of culottes indeed catches on, it'll at least make us less conspicuous and perhaps lead to some culotte-wearing men forgoing the inseam.
Re: The missing link ??
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:47 pm
by Big and Bashful
Caultron, that makes perfect sense, can't argue with anything you have said there.
Respect is, as they say, due.