I'm not sure how well it would work, but every increasing police budgets have been tragic.
Here is what the proponents are saying:





Really? I swear, when I wrote that it seemed like it was in the "advocacy" forum. If I was mistaken, I withdraw my objection! And I'll make an appointment with my optometrist to get new glasses
The people advocating for that should be clearer in their messaging, then. If we (the general public) only see "defund the police", it doesn't come across as a plan that any thought at all has been given. We're just waiting to see what happens the next time somebody calls 911 for an assault or a robbery.
I agree the messaging should be clearer.Ralph wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 3:33 pmThe people advocating for that should be clearer in their messaging, then. If we (the general public) only see "defund the police", it doesn't come across as a plan that any thought at all has been given. We're just waiting to see what happens the next time somebody calls 911 for an assault or a robbery.
It might be better to look at what advocates of defunding the police say.Fred in Skirts wrote: ↑Tue Jun 09, 2020 5:20 am The cries of defund the Police should be taken very seriously. One reason is they do not want to just defund them they want to disband them altogether.
TESSA STUART wrote:Defunding the police does not mean stripping a department entirely of its budget, or abolishing it altogether. It’s just about scaling police budgets back and reallocating those resources to other agencies, says Lynda Garcia, policing campaign director at the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. “A lot of what we advocate for is investment in community services — education, medical access… You can call it ‘defunding,’ but it’s just about directing or balancing the budget in a different way.”
The concept is simple: When cities start investing in community services, they reduce the need to call police in instances when police officers’ specific skill set isn’t required. “If someone is dealing with a mental health crisis, or someone has a substance abuse disorder, we are calling other entities that are better equipped to help these folks,” Garcia says.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... -1007254/
That does not seem to be the intent, although a small group will have you believe that it is. What most are looking for is more transparency and more accountability. I would certainly go along with the notion of de-militarising the police in the United States, and there absolutely needs to be proper and robust civil oversight of the police. They need to stop acting like an army of occupation and return to their roots as a civil order-keeping force, in the vein of Sir Robert Peel's original vision.Fred in Skirts wrote: ↑Tue Jun 09, 2020 5:20 amThe cries of defund the Police should be taken very seriously. One reason is they do not want to just defund them they want to disband them altogether.
The best rejoinder to that comment I've ever heard is that "when seconds count the police are only minutes away". Most of the time we're on our own, and we forget that at our peril.It will be your choice no one will be there to help.
Is that really true? What happened to presumed innocent until proven guilty?. If it is it seems like a charter for some malicious allegationsmoonshadow wrote: ↑Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:38 pm As it stands if a Tennessee State Trooper is even accused of certain crimes (domestic abuse being one of them) they are immediately terminated
Yes and not only in Tennessee but in many other states, counties and cities across the country.Shilo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 09, 2020 2:47 pmIs that really true? What happened to presumed innocent until proven guilty?. If it is it seems like a charter for some malicious allegationsmoonshadow wrote: ↑Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:38 pm As it stands if a Tennessee State Trooper is even accused of certain crimes (domestic abuse being one of them) they are immediately terminated
The UN has no authority to do this but it could lead to even more hatred if they try.The family of George Floyd, the black man killed while in police custody in Minneapolis on Memorial Day, has sent a letter to the globalist United Nations to ask for its help in disarming police officers in the United States of America.
It just shows how stupid some people are!!Mayor Bill de Blasio Vows to Cut NYPD Funding While Violent Crime Soars
Not exactly. Requested recommendations, not disarming. Breitbart cites this NBC article and reinterpreted it, which was then repeated by rightwing sites.Fred in Skirts wrote: ↑Tue Jun 09, 2020 9:06 pm The family of George Floyd, the black man killed while in police custody in Minneapolis on Memorial Day, has sent a letter to the globalist United Nations to ask for its help in disarming police officers in the United States of America.
George Floyd's family appeals to U.N. for support for police reform
George Floyd’s family and his legal team released on Monday a letter they sent to the United Nations requesting recommendations for police reform in the U.S.
The group sent a letter on June 3 to one of the international body’s working groups asking for support for the end of the provision of military equipment and military-type training for police, the teaching of deescalation techniques, independent prosecutions and autopsies for “extrajudicial” police killings, and more.
“When a group of people of any nation have been systemically deprived of their universal human right to life by its government for decades, it must appeal to the international community for its support and to the United Nations for its intervention,” Floyd’s family attorney Ben Crump said in a press release.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/li ... blogHeader
OK, I figured that'd be closer to the facts, and note how well they dovetail into my earlier commentary about de-militarisation, robust civil oversight, and civil accountability.