What do non abiding wives really think?

Non-fashion, non-skirt, non-gender discussions. If your post is related to fashion, skirts or gender, please choose one of the forums above for it.
User avatar
AMM
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 841
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 4:01 pm
Location: Thanks for all the fish!

Re: What do non abiding wives really think?

Post by AMM »

OK, I admit it. I'm turning into an Old Grump. Not to mention losing whatever good sense I ever had. But here goes...
Peter v wrote:I read constantly about men who have wives that absolutely don't want their man wearing skirts. Although I understand that this point of vieuw is possible, I don't understand what goes on in their mind. ...

If only we could hear what those women really think.
Maybe this is a Dumb Question(tm), but:

Have you considered asking them?
(I hope you already know that SkirtCafe is not a good place to find women who object to men wearing skirts.)

For instance, if you have a wife/girlfriend/whatever who is objecting, ask her. Then listen, really listen to the answer.

If you have a (male) friend who wants to wear a skirt, and whose wife/etc. objects, ask her (and listen to the answer.)

Keep in mind that each woman is different, each may have a different reason for objecting to skirt wearing. Also a particular woman may have one reason to object to her husband wearing a skirt, and another reason to object to her next-door neighbor. Etc.

Also keep in mind that if she thinks you are asking so that you can argue with her, she will probably not give you an honest answer. In fact, if there has been an argument about this, she may not have had the opportunity to be aware of her real reasons.
Peter v wrote:Only then could we maybe do something to alleviate the misinterpretation for a large proportion.
What if there is no misinterpretation to alleviate?

What if there is no "interpretation" under which she can accept the skirt-wearing?

If you ask a question, you must be prepared for answers that you don't like.
Peter v
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 916
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 8:42 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Peter v »

AMM, who do you think may call you an old grump? Not me. :wink:

I am divorced, been so two and a half years now, and at the time of divorce and long after, skirt wearing was not an issue, so I can't ask my ex. Friends I don't have, except you lot, of course :) A few aquaitances. In my aquaintances I don't have any situations that are suitable to ask "Why don't you want your husband to wear skirts". In any discussion I have with people, about skirt wearing, I do try to hear from women what they think about it, but generally all the women I talk to are enthousiastical; about my skirt wearing, so that is also not a suitable situation. I therefore react upon what I read on this forum. I would like to see many more men writing "I am not allowed to wear .....", and then ask them if they would ask their wives "can you tell me WHY? " This is meant to get a better understanding as to why women in general may think that way. And then with that knowledge try and do something about it. This does not mean that no one may have personal vieuws on issues without knowing why he or she thinks that way.

We know for a fact that many thoughts on different subjects are fixed thoughts, and were formed long ago. That does not mean that we cannot question them, and try to UNDERSTAND each other.

With all due respect, It is the vieuw that I think is stated here, that men seem to have to succum to what their wives think, meaning that possibly they will never be allowd to wear skirts. Depending on the relationship. Why do the men who state that think so? As seen form OUR standpoint, men who want to wear skirts, why not turn that around, and wear our skirts, and without being held back, wear skirts, while the wife gets used to the idea, or not as the case may be. All the while the husband not being impeded one bit. For some men it looks as if wearing a skirt is only putting on a piece of fabric, that is easily given up when the wife complains. (which she has the right to do) But I personally think there is more to wearing a skirt than that, and it is for those men that this discussion is important, it can be a personal freedom, which goes deeper than just a piece of cloth. Like walking all day in the rain, and not thinking anything of it, but when someone spits you directly in the face, it is not just a drip of water, but an extreme insult. You wear clothes all your life, but all at once another person stops you from wearing your choice, not only of clothing, but doesn't accept your identity.

Everybody has the right to feel the way they do. But should we accept (as I think is suggested in writings) that our wives at their discression determine for us when or if we may wear skirts? There also being no pre determined time scale, so the man is finally ready, possibly after taking half his life building up to it, and he may have to wait until he's 80 before his wife is finally decided about it.

Maybe the question should be:
"What should a partner be allowed to prevent the other from doing?"
"Should a partner be allowed to prevent someone from being his or her true self?"

In the marriage vouws there is nothing about not being allowed to change your outlook on life, or better said, not to develop yourself, or not change the clothes that you wear.

What does stand there somewhere, is that we should respect each other.
You can wear a skirt and respect the non understanding of your wife, and your wife can not understand but respect you, for who you are, and in that not do anything to keep you from wearing skirts.

I say that in principle, generally speaking of course, wives should not impede the husband's freedom, and his wearing of skirts. Which shall not say that she has to accept it for herself. She can take all the time in the world, but in the meantime, the husband should be able to go unhindered with his skirt wearing. Don't even mention egoistic. It is often a long road that was taken before men finally got that far, and the fact that is finally out and on the table, says enough, it is not just some whim, from him, but a way of life for him. It is then his freedom that is challenged and withheld.

I can only say these things in general as I see them, because every husband and wife situation is unique.

Luckily, in some cases, when the situation has been by hindsight suitable, in a relative short period of time, the couple have come so far that the at first not understanding wife and her unwillingness to allow the wearing of a skirt, has been eventually turned around to understanding and the husband has been "" allowed "" to wear skirts, at the discression of his wife.

Men who want to wear skirts do so not to shock any one, but for their own needs, as all other things they do in life.

There is no blame to anybody for thinking as they do. But there is a question in how far one has a right to prevent the other from doing something that is, or can be a life's neccessity. ( In finally being the person you really are )

When another person wants to keep you from being who you really are, that is very questionable.

This is not about men for whom skirt wearing is no issue, and don't give one iota if they do or don't, just another thing to do when they have done everything else.

I have read the answers, and getting people to take part in the discussion is a success, but please don't misinterpret to quickly what others write, and get all heated up about it. That's not what we want at all.

Understanding, that is what we want and need. Only by stating things we think, putting it down in writing, can we form our visions and move forward.

Peter v.
Last edited by Peter v on Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A man is the same man in a pair of pants or a skirt. It is only the way people look at him that makes the difference.
Peter v
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 916
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 8:42 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Peter v »

sapphire wrote:Pythos, Thanks for posting. This thread did not ring true with me either and I'm TOTALLY accepting of men in skirts (or leggings, or catsuits)

I'm willing to chalk some of this up to a language problem, but the "non-abiding" part comes across as almost "illegal", almost as though if the woman deosn't like to see her man in a skirt, or whatever, she should be thrown in jail. Again, that may be faults in translation. But why does it have to come down to the woman has to accept everything the man does "or else"

Peter v wrote
Is about what seems to be the action taken by many women, and which is often described as that there is nothing to be done about it, that we men must succumb to the whims of those women.
Well, historically and in particular cases of domestic abuse, that statement works the other way around.

Surely there are more women's shelters than there are men's shelters.
In my case, Sapphire, I do sometimes search for words to describe something, but can't always find the appropriate words.

I agree, the part about abuse to women, that is just terrible. And the need for women's shelters. It is fortunate that there are shelters. Of course I am discussing specifically about skirt wearing, it being witheld from the husband, by his wife, not any other domestic issues.

Peter v
A man is the same man in a pair of pants or a skirt. It is only the way people look at him that makes the difference.
User avatar
crfriend
Master Barista
Posts: 15151
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: New England (U.S.)
Contact:

Re: Styles of argument

Post by crfriend »

AMM wrote:If women are less enamourate of "reasoned thinking," it may be that they often experience what goes by that name as a game rigged against them, one in which their own experiences and concerns are "proven" to be negligible and and further evidence that it is their own fault that they are where they are in society. And if men are, on the whole, more enamourate of it, might it be because "reasoned thinking," as usually understood and practiced, usually ends up justifying their doing whatever it is they are doing?
That's a good approach, AMM. As you might have inferred, I was working a "nature vs. nurture" hypothesis and you've introduced a sociological one, which adds an appropriate extra layer of complexity. I wish there were ways to test some of these ideas, not to "validate" one or the other, but rather from simple curiosity.
AMM wrote:
Women may be more inclined to place heavier weight in their first impressions filtered through their life-experiences. Whilst this may seemingly deprive them of the deep workings of things, this attitude is usually quite enough to get by in the world. Unfortunately, whilst that approach doesn't provide terribly well for a world that's in constant fast-paced flux,...
Carl, I have a great deal of respect for you, but I can't figure out how to see this as anything but patronizing.
If that came off as patronising or condescending, please be aware that there was precisely NO intent. It was more along the lines of "thinking out loud" rather than a complete fully-formed thought. When there is intent, it's usually "in your face" (or latched onto your backside like a toy poodle). :) So, if I managed to offend anyone, please accept my apologies.

Who knows, perhaps the ways that men and women think is unknowable. That wonderful joke that somebody posted a few days ago about the genie indicates that there are perceptions that the topic is unfathomable after all.
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
User avatar
sapphire
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 1308
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:42 pm
Location: New England

Post by sapphire »

AMM wrote
the science fiction writer whose name I can't remember who was fond of saying "Man is a rationalizing animal."
That was Robert A. Heinlein
Sasquatch
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 486
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 3:18 am
Location: North Carolina coast

Re: What do non abiding wives really think?

Post by Sasquatch »

AMM wrote:OK, I admit it. I'm turning into an Old Grump.
AMM, I think you hit the nail on the head! And with just ten words. And you are clearly not alone in your condition. You guys could make Grumpy Old Men Parts III through XX! I was gone for the weekend and get back to read two or three threads where you guys have done little but argue and beat up the same dead horse(s) over and over! How many words can you expend over so little substance?

Congratulations. In three days, you biddies have painted the perfect portrait of MALE MENOPAUSE - or for you younger ones, the Y Chromosome Edition of the PMS Monthly! (Now call me a sexist bigot!) :roll:

Next time y'all feel inclined to pitch "hissy fits" like these, I recommend two shots of Cuervo and a nap. :)

Sasq
Cat on a tin roof, dogs in a pile,
Nothin' left to do but smile, smile, smile!

Hunter/Garcia
Artemis
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:43 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by Artemis »

sapphire wrote:AMM wrote
the science fiction writer whose name I can't remember who was fond of saying "Man is a rationalizing animal."
That was Robert A. Heinlein
Ahh - one of my favourite authors of all time - for a man of his era - insightfully explored the social mores of the time - I can't think of a novel off-hand where he put a man in a skirt and examined what happened, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was one - will have to troll through my collection again.
crfriend (Carl) thought out loud:
Men, when given opportunity, will typically dissect a problem before forming an opinion on it.
...
Women may be more inclined to place heavier weight in their first impressions filtered through their life-experiences.
LOL - not the men I know! Nor the women :lol: :lol: :lol:

But I'm familiar with those thoughts. I've also heard it mused that women's supposed "first impressions" are actually based on a huge amount of data rapidly analyzed and processed to form an opinion.

I personally believe it is all one and the same, and perhaps comes back to the different language that is often used to describe the same behaviour in men and women. She's stubborn, he's determined etc.

And returning to the original thread - what do non-abiding wives really think - being neither one nor the other, I can only offer my musings on the topic - but I suspect the majority of the fears come back to those "social mores" Mr Heinlein took such delight in examining and playing "what if's" with.

"What will the neighbour's think" is a *very* powerful motivator.
"Will our family & friends shun us" is a very real fear.

Some people will never work past these fears, some will take a long-time but will get there. And some will be immediately supportive to the point of pushing their men-folk out the door in skirts!

A.
GG - proud wife of B - lurking around here somewhere - who has some gorgeous skirts I wish I could fit into.
kiltair
Active Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:20 pm
Location: Mechelen, Belgium

Post by kiltair »

Artemis wrote:
Ahh - one of my favourite authors of all time - for a man of his era - insightfully explored the social mores of the time - I can't think of a novel off-hand where he put a man in a skirt and examined what happened, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was one - will have to troll through my collection again.
"I will fear no evil" tells about a men's brain in a women's body. I don't remember if 'skirts' are discussed...

Jan
Post Reply