There is a lot of "work" I can't/wouldn't dare do in a suit. Yet for men, a suit is required in a lot of situations.Coder wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2024 2:56 pm ...
Because it's very costumey. It's not a "real/practical" outfit. Even though much of women's clothings styles aren't practical, what he puts together is beyond what you could, say, go shopping in or doing any amount of work (which, for men, is basically an unspoken rule of clothing - being able to do work).
...
Similarly, the kilt as a full "traditional" outfit is very costumy, to my eye, at least. I try to be mindful not to be costumy in any outfits I wear, but it's tough.
I think there is a time and place for somewhat showy and impractical clothing, as well as for the practical stuff that doesn't look as nice. Knowing when and where something is appropriate is part of modesty.
Mouse, I think the fact that you separate work and play shows that you get my point above, at least on some level, and are working towards a healthy balance. We can quibble about this outfit or that, but having that separation shows you are mindful of this issue. That's a lot more than I can say for many folks in "ordinary" garb I see on a daily basis, both men and women.Mouse wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2024 2:20 pmI am slightly conflicted over this. I get totally that he is over the top and projecting performance art. But, I also do not want to be constrained to skirts in male drab all of the time. When I push the boat out a bit in my non working outfits "Mouse at Play", where do I fit on the "normalise MIS" scale?