Don't shoot me, but ...
Peter v wrote:
Ah Peter, you have never seen what I have done with trousers. Back in my most nefarious incarnation as a biology student, I transferred my botantical illustrations into hand embroidered versions on a pair of worn out blue jeans. The embroidery covered and reinforced the thin areas of cloth.And so there are still more variations possible, beat that with trousers!
-
SkirtDude
That's real um handy, with style! I really like flowery embroidery. Dont have any on my skirts yet, but it sur can be nice.sapphire wrote:Peter v wrote:Ah Peter, you have never seen what I have done with trousers. Back in my most nefarious incarnation as a biology student, I transferred my botantical illustrations into hand embroidered versions on a pair of worn out blue jeans. The embroidery covered and reinforced the thin areas of cloth.And so there are still more variations possible, beat that with trousers!
Peter v.
A man is the same man in a pair of pants or a skirt. It is only the way people look at him that makes the difference.
I once had a pair of flared jeans (yes! I am that old 
) with red embroidery tapering from ankle to knee, and I loved those jeans. I loved the way the flares flapped around my ankles- a precursor of the joy of skirts, and the look also. Now some machine embroidery on a denim skirt is a definite thought without going towards "femme".
) with red embroidery tapering from ankle to knee, and I loved those jeans. I loved the way the flares flapped around my ankles- a precursor of the joy of skirts, and the look also. Now some machine embroidery on a denim skirt is a definite thought without going towards "femme".Hey you're not the only one from that era..Sarongman wrote:I once had a pair of flared jeans (yes! I am that old
If "Femme" means having a operation to change your hanging... to a inward.... then we don't qualify at all. We keep saying "Femme" but what does it really mean? Doe you have to have a split between the legs? Or does it have nothing to do with that? Both women AND men can wear finer, attractive clothing, and is in no way bound by your sex. I think that most attractive outspoken clothing, like clothing with embroidery, tailored clothing, in general the more attractive clothing "Like that which women tend to wear" is just that. Very nice clothing. Why call it "Femme"? The word Femme in my vieuw seems to suggest being female. Finer freestyle, creative clothing is generally called Femme, but I would opt for any other name. Unless we can aliënate the word femme from the suggestion of being female.
So come on guys, let's think of a better name to break with the association with femme and women. that 'll be hard to do, but at least we can think about it during the long winter nights ahead.
Peter v.
A man is the same man in a pair of pants or a skirt. It is only the way people look at him that makes the difference.
-
Jerry Young
- Junior Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:51 pm
- Location: Sulphur Springs, Texas 75482
Public Restroom Practices
Hi Everyone,
Most public restrooms have partitions between stalls so it shouldn't be a problem, but if they don't they usually have stalls around toilets. I don't have a problem with or without partitions. I just don't want them staring at me while I am trying to pee. Which, in itself, is a whole other problem!
Most public restrooms have partitions between stalls so it shouldn't be a problem, but if they don't they usually have stalls around toilets. I don't have a problem with or without partitions. I just don't want them staring at me while I am trying to pee. Which, in itself, is a whole other problem!
Jerry W. Young
Yes, Sapphire,sapphire wrote:Peter v,
I loved your response.
Why not call it "embellished" clothing vs "unembellished" clothing?
em·bel·lish (m-blsh)
tr.v. em·bel·lished, em·bel·lish·ing, em·bel·lish·es
1. To make beautiful, as by ornamentation; decorate.
2. To add ornamental or fictitious details to: a fanciful account that embellishes the true story.
It is a very good word, only a bit tongue twisting to speak out.
peter v
A man is the same man in a pair of pants or a skirt. It is only the way people look at him that makes the difference.
-
AMM
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 841
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 4:01 pm
- Location: Thanks for all the fish!
Re: Don't shoot me, but ...
It hadn't actually occurred to me, but now that you mention it....JRMILLER wrote:Subject: Don't shoot me, but ...
