Kilts by the hectare

Kilt-based fashions, both traditional and contemporary. Come on guys, bring on the pleats!
User avatar
mugman
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 450
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:04 am
Location: South West of England
Contact:

Kilts by the hectare

Post by mugman »

Welcome to the Strange But True...

check the minimum requirement of this manufacturer's tartan kilt... :alien:

http://www.alibaba.com/product-free/125 ... _Kilt.html

...like Mrs Bucket's friend (UK sitcom) - room for a pony with every order.

Pete
User avatar
skirtingtoday
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 1518
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:28 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: Kilts by the hectare

Post by skirtingtoday »

That's a very very LARGE kilt... :shock:
"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on" - Winston Churchill.
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it" - Joseph Goebbels
User avatar
GerdG
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 395
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 2:16 pm
Location: DK
Contact:

Re: Kilts by the hectare

Post by GerdG »

Yes, it is difficult with forreign languages. Probably he means minimum 5 kilts per order. In that city of Pakistan where he has his business there are a lot of kilt makers. Some of them will ship just one kilt.
GerdG

There ARE viable alternatives to trousers.
janrok
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 360
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:06 am

Re: Kilts by the hectare

Post by janrok »

Perhaps these kilts grow on trees.

BTW it is Hyacinth Bucket's sister Violet who has a house with room for a pony ánd a husband who is a drag queen.
User avatar
Charlie
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 668
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 8:52 pm
Location: Somerset, England

Re: Kilts by the hectare

Post by Charlie »

janrok wrote:BTW it is Hyacinth Bucket's sister Violet who has a house with room for a pony ánd a husband who is a drag queen.
For those not familiar with the character - Hyacinth Bucket is a middle-aged social climber (TV sitcom) who pronounces Bucket as Bouquet (as in bunch of flowers) - not like Charlie Bucket of chocolate factory fame.

Charlie (not Bucket or Bouquet)
If I want to dress like a woman, I'll wear jeans.
User avatar
JohnH
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 1040
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:46 am
Location: Irving, Texas USA

Re: Kilts by the hectare

Post by JohnH »

I like the title of the thread.

It's easy to remember what a hectare is - an area of a square of 100 meters on a side.

But an acre - that's a little hard to figure out. You remember in school that there are 640 acres to a square mile. Then you read somewhere that there are 80 chains to a mile. Then you figure out that an acre is an area of 1 chain by 10 chains, and a chain is 66 feet. You may ask why an acre is defined as a skinny rectangle instead of a square. Why, it's easier to plow a skinny rectangular field than a square field!

Our spineless leaders in the U.S. don't have the good sense to lead the U.S. population to use S.I. [metric] units instead of the "colonial conglomeration" known as the U.S. Customary Units.

John
User avatar
Milfmog
Moderator
Posts: 2233
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Buckinghamshire, UK

Re: Kilts by the hectare

Post by Milfmog »

JohnH wrote:Then you figure out that an acre is an area of 1 chain by 10 chains, and a chain is 66 feet.
Better phrased as "1 chain by 1 furlong". Heck if you want to add confusion you might as well do it properly :D

Have fun,


Ian.
Do not argue with idiots; they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Cogito ergo sum - Descartes
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce
User avatar
JohnH
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 1040
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:46 am
Location: Irving, Texas USA

Re: Kilts by the hectare

Post by JohnH »

Milfmog wrote:
JohnH wrote:Then you figure out that an acre is an area of 1 chain by 10 chains, and a chain is 66 feet.
Better phrased as "1 chain by 1 furlong". Heck if you want to add confusion you might as well do it properly :D

Have fun,
Ian.
You learn something new everyday. I have heard of a furlong but never knew what it was.

John
User avatar
crfriend
Master Barista
Posts: 14483
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: New England (U.S.)
Contact:

Re: Kilts by the hectare

Post by crfriend »

JohnH wrote:I have heard of a furlong but never knew what it was.
And then we have 1.80E12. What's that you ask? It's the speed of light in furlongs per fortnight.

The most common place one runs into furlongs is in horse racing.
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
User avatar
Mugs-n-such
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 474
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:23 pm
Location: Kansas

Re: Kilts by the hectare

Post by Mugs-n-such »

Just to add to the confusion, I had also heard an acre is one rod (one rod = 16.5 feet) times 1/2 mile (2640 feet). Either way, it turns out to be 43,560 square feet I believe. Interestingly (to me at least) if you take the square root of 43,560 it is about 208.710 so that is how long on each side (approximately) a square acre would be...roughly 2/3 the length of a football field.
User avatar
JohnH
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 1040
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:46 am
Location: Irving, Texas USA

Re: Kilts by the hectare

Post by JohnH »

Mugs-n-such wrote:Just to add to the confusion, I had also heard an acre is one rod (one rod = 16.5 feet) times 1/2 mile (2640 feet). Either way, it turns out to be 43,560 square feet I believe. Interestingly (to me at least) if you take the square root of 43,560 it is about 208.710 so that is how long on each side (approximately) a square acre would be...roughly 2/3 the length of a football field.
Now that's a real skinny field. There are 4 rods to a chain. An acre is 1 chain by 1 furlong, which is 4 rods by 40 rods or 160 square rods. Or the alternate definition is 1 rod by 1/2 mile which is 1 rod by 160 rods (there are 40 chains to a half-mile) which is also 160 square rods.

160 square rods * (16.5 feet/rod)^2 = 43,560 square feet.

People who oppose the use of SI units for the most part don't even know the "colonial units" very well. Young minds are taught this drivel [colonial units] in grade school, and give up on doing any math or science. Also the U.S. has problems with exports of goods that have special fasteners that require special tools to service them - that is inch-measured fasteners.

John
User avatar
crfriend
Master Barista
Posts: 14483
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: New England (U.S.)
Contact:

Re: Kilts by the hectare

Post by crfriend »

JohnH wrote:People who oppose the use of SI units for the most part don't even know the "colonial units" very well.
That's Imperial units, please. Assorted seemingly random measurements have been around vastly longer than what the French have foisted upon us quite recently, the moniker of "SI" notwithstanding. ;)
Young minds are taught this drivel [colonial units] in grade school, and give up on doing any math or science.
But furlongs-per-fortnight is a perfectly good way of measuring speed! Why dumb it down so we have to express it in centimeters per kilosecond? (There has been at least one space probe that underwent unintentional lithobraking due to the confusion of units. FAIL!) Besides, Sexagesimal is a perfectly decent way to delineate time (the French failed here in spades -- no decimals for you)
Also the U.S. has problems with exports of goods that have special fasteners that require special tools to service them - that is inch-measured fasteners.
Nope. That's dead. For all practical purposes the US is using SI for (what little is left of) its manufacturing purposes, and has done so for about 20 years. To do otherwise would be stupid in the extreme. (I do, however, recall, first-hand, the consternation that the cutover caused when auto-mechanics had to buy a set of SI tools in addition to the Imperial ones that they'd already paid a small fortune for. There was much complaining.)
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
User avatar
Since1982
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 3449
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:13 pm
Location: My BUTT is Living in the USA, and sitting on the tip of the Sky Needle, Ow Ow Ow!!. Get the POINT?

Re: Kilts by the hectare

Post by Since1982 »

JohnH wrote:I have heard of a furlong but never knew what it was.
A Furlong is a Hollywood Actor. John Furlong to be exact. In Terminator 2, he did his first work in movies.

Next thing we see will be Cowboy Boots made in Ulanga. Or Square Dancing books coming from Afghanistan. The planet Earth is shrinking, and shrinking, and shrinking, and shrinking. :faint:
I had to remove this signature as it was being used on Twitter. This is my OPINION, you NEEDN'T AGREE.

Story of Life, Perspire, Expire, Funeral Pyre!
I've been skirted part time since 1972 and full time since 2005. http://skirts4men.myfreeforum.org/
pleated
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 308
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 2:08 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: Kilts by the hectare

Post by pleated »

JohnH wrote:
Mugs-n-such wrote:Just to add to the confusion, I had also heard an acre is one rod (one rod = 16.5 feet) times 1/2 mile (2640 feet). Either way, it turns out to be 43,560 square feet I believe. Interestingly (to me at least) if you take the square root of 43,560 it is about 208.710 so that is how long on each side (approximately) a square acre would be...roughly 2/3 the length of a football field.
Now that's a real skinny field. There are 4 rods to a chain. An acre is 1 chain by 1 furlong, which is 4 rods by 40 rods or 160 square rods. Or the alternate definition is 1 rod by 1/2 mile which is 1 rod by 160 rods (there are 40 chains to a half-mile) which is also 160 square rods.

160 square rods * (16.5 feet/rod)^2 = 43,560 square feet.

People who oppose the use of SI units for the most part don't even know the "colonial units" very well. Young minds are taught this drivel [colonial units] in grade school, and give up on doing any math or science. Also the U.S. has problems with exports of goods that have special fasteners that require special tools to service them - that is inch-measured fasteners.

John
"rods". When I learned about those measurements they were called "roods".
User avatar
Since1982
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 3449
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:13 pm
Location: My BUTT is Living in the USA, and sitting on the tip of the Sky Needle, Ow Ow Ow!!. Get the POINT?

Re: Kilts by the hectare

Post by Since1982 »

That is definitely confusing...however, an ACRE is 4,840 square yards and it's square..not narrow. Sheesh..:faint:
I had to remove this signature as it was being used on Twitter. This is my OPINION, you NEEDN'T AGREE.

Story of Life, Perspire, Expire, Funeral Pyre!
I've been skirted part time since 1972 and full time since 2005. http://skirts4men.myfreeforum.org/
Post Reply