I’m not sure he was a female impersonator or drag performer as much as it looks like he just wore women’s clothes on a day when the women wore mens clothing. A gag “Opposite Day” kind of a day for God knows what reason. I think the difference is he did it as a joke and is fighting drag performers who do it as a profession.moonshadow wrote: ↑Tue Feb 28, 2023 10:19 am Well well well...
Turns out old big shot governor Bill Big Time Ban It Lee was....wad..... wait for it....
A female impersonator back in 1977....
https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/p ... 951107007/
Ain't that like a southern Christian politician....?
Do as I say, not as I do!
Still doesn’t make the draconic legislation whereby the government know tells us what we can and cannot wear.
This is the thing that I never get. The same people legislating against drag performers and pushing for government to regulate what people can wear also bemoan big government interfering into the their lives. They hate government telling them what they can and cannot do.
This to me is cherry-picking against certain people and not legislating against clothing choices.
There is something called reaction formation though that seems always rears it’s ugly head in politics. The idea that someone who harbors certain tendencies that upset them become overly vocal against those tendencies to assuage the guilt they feel over having such tendencies. Think of the closeted gay politician who is staunchly against gay marriage.
Live and let live would make the world a better place