The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Clippings from news sources involving fashion freedom and other gender equality issues.
User avatar
crfriend
Master Barista
Posts: 14432
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: New England (U.S.)
Contact:

Re: The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Post by crfriend »

gender free universe wrote: Wed Jan 11, 2023 3:37 pmSo, it is appearing that to have access to something other than slacks in the business world, one likely has to identify as something other than male (non-binary), because of reasons.
That is the way that it seems to be shaking out -- which will effectively exclude 95% of the men out there. I find that sad. But, entirely predictable.
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
ScotL
Chatbot
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2022 12:43 am

Re: The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Post by ScotL »

gender free universe wrote: Wed Jan 11, 2023 3:37 pm So, it is appearing that to have access to something other than slacks in the business world, one likely has to identify as something other than male (non-binary), because of reasons.
I think you perfectly summed up the issue most of us have with these labels. Everyone hates labels but everyone uses them out of necessity. We’d be happier if there was a new label that describes ‘identify as male but wears skirts.’
User avatar
moonshadow
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 6994
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 1:58 am
Location: Warm Beach, Washington
Contact:

Re: The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Post by moonshadow »

Folks...

I don't think most people really care what you call yourself.
-Andrea
The old hillbilly from the coal fields of the Appalachian mountains currently living like there's no tomorrow on the west coast.
User avatar
gender free universe
Active Member
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2022 11:18 am
Location: Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Re: The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Post by gender free universe »

Two different movements intersect. The expansion of gender roles happens to intersect with the expansion of binarity. Thus we observe the same phenomena with different causes. Is it that simple?
User avatar
crfriend
Master Barista
Posts: 14432
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: New England (U.S.)
Contact:

Re: The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Post by crfriend »

gender free universe wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 2:41 pmTwo different movements intersect. The expansion of gender roles happens to intersect with the expansion of binarity. Thus we observe the same phenomena with different causes. Is it that simple?
It could be that simple, but the thesis, I believe, is false because the only space that gender roles have expanded is for women; for men, their role has been undergoing a violent contraction in recent years. [0] Thus the "rise of the non-binary" may be primarily men who are desperately trying to find a way out of what is an ever-shrinking coffin.

The proper answer is to merely reassert ourselves and take back what's been taken away -- mainly emotion, sensitivity, civility, and humility. The ability to "play the peacock" would follow naturally from such a reassertion. But, yet again, men prove themselves to be their own worst enemies and refuse to reassert and are likely, then, doomed.


[0] Violent contractions also produce odd things in the universe -- like black holes.
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
FLbreezy
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 490
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2021 12:40 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Re: The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Post by FLbreezy »

ScotL wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 11:43 am
gender free universe wrote: Wed Jan 11, 2023 3:37 pm So, it is appearing that to have access to something other than slacks in the business world, one likely has to identify as something other than male (non-binary), because of reasons.
I think you perfectly summed up the issue most of us have with these labels. Everyone hates labels but everyone uses them out of necessity. We’d be happier if there was a new label that describes ‘identify as male but wears skirts.’
We don't need a new label. Unless it's "I'm a grown up man and my mommy stopped dressing me a long time ago."
User avatar
Myopic Bookworm
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 659
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 9:12 pm
Location: SW England (Cotswolds)

Re: The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Post by Myopic Bookworm »

crfriend wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 3:34 pm The only space that gender roles have expanded is for women; for men, their role has been undergoing a violent contraction in recent years.
I don't agree. Not long ago, you very rarely encountered a man pushing a pram or supervising his pre-school child. Admittedly, when I was in that position, I was quite often (but not always) the only dad in the toddlers' group, but over the last 15 years I have seen a steady increase in the number of men out and about with baby buggies and pushchairs (and no hovering female), or taking part in parent and toddler groups. People are less surprised to find men working in care homes, or as nurses or primary school teachers. And I can't think of any role that men have been excluded from in recent years (cup-winning footballer, perhaps, for those in England?!): the opening of an opportunity to women does not generally close it to men.
Barleymower
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2022 10:28 pm

Re: The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Post by Barleymower »

I've been there in the toddler groups, a man on his own among women ans kids. Quite often I found myself gazed upon like a dog licking it's balls.
What to do? I played with the kids. The mums were ignoring them, deep in their chatting. So I got stuck in. Kids love playing with men.
User avatar
crfriend
Master Barista
Posts: 14432
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: New England (U.S.)
Contact:

Re: The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Post by crfriend »

Myopic Bookworm wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 11:13 pm
crfriend wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 3:34 pm The only space that gender roles have expanded is for women; for men, their role has been undergoing a violent contraction in recent years.
I don't agree. Not long ago, you very rarely encountered a man pushing a pram or supervising his pre-school child. Admittedly, when I was in that position, I was quite often (but not always) the only dad in the toddlers' group, but over the last 15 years I have seen a steady increase in the number of men out and about with baby buggies and pushchairs (and no hovering female), or taking part in parent and toddler groups. People are less surprised to find men working in care homes, or as nurses or primary school teachers. And I can't think of any role that men have been excluded from in recent years (cup-winning footballer, perhaps, for those in England?!): the opening of an opportunity to women does not generally close it to men.
Criticism accepted, and I'll need to cogitate on the matter a bit. What I was specifically referring to is what the "stereotypical male" looks like today versus what one looked like a half-century ago. What I see in the modern stereotype is a 4th-rate parody of what it really means to be a man. I may well be wrong -- and in a way I actually hope I am, but I don't see it playing out on Main Street (at least where I am), and one should trust personal observation more than hype and press coverage.
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
ScotL
Chatbot
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2022 12:43 am

Re: The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Post by ScotL »

FLbreezy wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 4:14 pm
ScotL wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 11:43 am
gender free universe wrote: Wed Jan 11, 2023 3:37 pm So, it is appearing that to have access to something other than slacks in the business world, one likely has to identify as something other than male (non-binary), because of reasons.
I think you perfectly summed up the issue most of us have with these labels. Everyone hates labels but everyone uses them out of necessity. We’d be happier if there was a new label that describes ‘identify as male but wears skirts.’
We don't need a new label. Unless it's "I'm a grown up man and my mommy stopped dressing me a long time ago."
True. True. We don’t “need” more labels. But they exist and people always name stuff.

Guess it’s not a label per se that is needed. But what I feel needs to be “out there” is the idea that “normal” men want to wear skirts and it doesn’t mean a damn thing
FLbreezy
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 490
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2021 12:40 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Re: The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Post by FLbreezy »

ScotL wrote: Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:08 am But what I feel needs to be “out there” is the idea that “normal” men want to wear skirts and it doesn’t mean a damn thing
Going back to the dark times before "meme" meant "sending funny cat pictures on the internet":
meme: an element of a culture or system of behavior passed from one individual to another by imitation or other nongenetic means.
Step 1: be "normal" (as boring as that sounds)
Step 2: wear a skirt
Step 3: don't care what people think :ugeek:
Step 4: Profit?

Meme on friends, spread the idea. Life's too short to wait for the rest of the world to catch up.
ScotL
Chatbot
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2022 12:43 am

Re: The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Post by ScotL »

FLbreezy wrote: Fri Jan 13, 2023 1:17 pm
ScotL wrote: Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:08 am But what I feel needs to be “out there” is the idea that “normal” men want to wear skirts and it doesn’t mean a damn thing
Going back to the dark times before "meme" meant "sending funny cat pictures on the internet":
meme: an element of a culture or system of behavior passed from one individual to another by imitation or other nongenetic means.
Step 1: be "normal" (as boring as that sounds)
Step 2: wear a skirt
Step 3: don't care what people think :ugeek:
Step 4: Profit?

Meme on friends, spread the idea. Life's too short to wait for the rest of the world to catch up.
Seems easy. Even too easy. But it’s that step 3 that trips myself up. If it was just out there that me wearing a skirt meant jacksh1t then it’d be easier. But I did wear a kilt to the movies tonight and received not one comment. Though I did have a potential Marilyn Monroe event. But I’m unclenching more and more by the fact I didn’t get a comment. Sometimes you do just want to be left alone
Offkilter69
Distinguished Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2022 2:44 am
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Post by Offkilter69 »

FLbreezy wrote: Fri Jan 13, 2023 1:17 pm
ScotL wrote: Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:08 am But what I feel needs to be “out there” is the idea that “normal” men want to wear skirts and it doesn’t mean a damn thing
But I did wear a kilt to the movies tonight and received not one comment. Though I did have a potential Marilyn Monroe event. But I’m unclenching more and more by the fact I didn’t get a comment. Sometimes you do just want to be left alone
I agree. To some it may seem like that a guy wearing a kilt, skirt, or dress is just trying to get attention and be noticed, like some of the recent red carpet male celebrities have seemingly done. For me, that’s quite the opposite. I just want to have the freedom to wear what I want without judgement or belittlement. But, the more I wear kilts in public the less I care about what others think. I’m actually more concerned about how negative reactions affect my SO. I don’t want her to be embarrassed by being with a guy who wears a man-skirt. To her credit, she has never expressed any negative feelings to me, but that doesn’t mean she doesn’t have them.
ScotL
Chatbot
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2022 12:43 am

Re: The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Post by ScotL »

ScotL wrote: Sat Jan 14, 2023 5:06 am
FLbreezy wrote: Fri Jan 13, 2023 1:17 pmBut I did wear a kilt to the movies tonight and received not one comment. Though I did have a potential Marilyn Monroe event. But I’m unclenching more and more by the fact I didn’t get a comment. Sometimes you do just want to be left alone
I agree. To some it may seem like that a guy wearing a kilt, skirt, or dress is just trying to get attention and be noticed, like some of the recent red carpet male celebrities have seemingly done. For me, that’s quite the opposite. I just want to have the freedom to wear what I want without judgement or belittlement. But, the more I wear kilts in public the less I care about what others think. I’m actually more concerned about how negative reactions affect my SO. I don’t want her to be embarrassed by being with a guy who wears a man-skirt. To her credit, she has never expressed any negative feelings to me, but that doesn’t mean she doesn’t have them.
That’s what I loved about the coverage of the most recent golden globes. Billy porter wore a different color but the same tux dress he did before. One other guy wore a skirt over pants. But there wasn’t a big uproar over it. It just wasn’t the big deal it was before. Though I will miss the awesome comments you get when wearing a kilt, the loss of angst over stepping out in one will be really nice. Particularly if it opens up the kind of skirt one can wear without judgement. The skirt type that is the kilt is accepted as male. Slowly the mainstream will see other skirt types as acceptable as the kilt
Last edited by Uncle Al on Sat Jan 14, 2023 11:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Quoting format
User avatar
Sinned
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 5804
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:28 pm
Location: York, England

Re: The New York Times: Defining Nonbinary Work Wear

Post by Sinned »

I was reading a DM article by Janet Street-Porter in which she says, "Women have fought to dress as they please ....". It appears that we may have to go through the same fight.
I believe in offering every assistance short of actual help but then mainly just want to be left to be myself in all my difference and uniqueness.
Locked