I'm not sure I agree with how the author frames the idea of "gender-fluid clothing". That is, I think too much emphasis is placed on "fluidity" because it's a trendy keyword. What's wrong with variety?An outfit is a form of expression and not categorisation. An individual’s “OOTD” is a space for inclusivity and fluidity.
I guess what bugged me most was this line:
But was he being "gender-fluid"? Were his clothes fluid? Was he not just wearing a skirt in a male sense, a male way?For a man of Pitt’s age, to do this, means to spell out that gender-fluid clothing is not just a “Gen-Z thing” but a worldview that is here to stay.