I've been tempted more than a few times to put the spike through it, but some good points have been made, both from a biological point of view and the notion that management and control of our "base urges" (including things like aggression and anger) is woefully lacking in some cultures (most notably the USA) which seem to be in a state of "arrested development" where there are no safety-valves or harmless releases open to men (this is part and parcel of the "macho" box").
I will state, however, that trying to turn men into 4th-rate women will fail, and it will fail in grand fashion. The thesis is simply fatally flawed because it doesn't take evolution into account -- and we have to deal with that whether we like it or not.
In short, much more rancour about the matter will get the thread locked and likely pushed into the Cesspool.