As nature intended or a smooth operator?
- Epiceneguy
- Distinguished Member
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 8:22 pm
- Location: UK
As nature intended or a smooth operator?
Soooo, quick question,
Hairy legs or shaved??????
Hairy legs or shaved??????
When life gives you lemons, slice them and put them into your G&T!
Re: As nature intended or a smooth operator?
I don't shave my legs. I wouldn't if I wore shorts so don't feel the necessity with skirts. Leg hair is fair so not very noticeable.
I believe in offering every assistance short of actual help but then mainly just want to be left to be myself in all my difference and uniqueness.
- Epiceneguy
- Distinguished Member
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 8:22 pm
- Location: UK
Re: As nature intended or a smooth operator?
You're lucky, I look like Chewbacca's inbred cousin in a certain light, lol.
When life gives you lemons, slice them and put them into your G&T!
-
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 7:03 am
- Location: West Midlands, England, UK
Re: As nature intended or a smooth operator?
I shave them. Not much hair but it’s dark, on pale Scottish skin. Shaved looks a lot tidier, and feels way better.
- Jim
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:39 am
- Location: Northern Illinois, USA
Re: As nature intended or a smooth operator?
As nature intended, here.
- crfriend
- Master Barista
- Posts: 14579
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
- Location: New England (U.S.)
- Contact:
Re: As nature intended or a smooth operator?
I shave 'em as well, but that's because I can't grow a good pelt there and they look like the moths have been at me.
Incidentally, I started shaving the things well before I started wearing skirts, so there wasn't any connection. I merely hated the way they looked.
Incidentally, I started shaving the things well before I started wearing skirts, so there wasn't any connection. I merely hated the way they looked.
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
-
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:54 pm
- Location: Rockland County, New York, USA
Re: As nature intended or a smooth operator?
Shaved. My legs look more muscular and show more definition shaved.
-
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:05 pm
Re: As nature intended or a smooth operator?
I shave and epilate. This is an aesthetic thing. I wear sheer tights and they look horrible with leg hair. I also prefer the feel of smooth legs when they rub together.
Re: As nature intended or a smooth operator?
Many years ago I shaved them and enjoyed the feel tremendously. However, MOH didn't and I've never shaved them again. To look smooth I wear opaque tights, which solve the aesthetic if not the feel.
Tom
Tom
Carpe Diem......Seize the Day !
- skirtingtoday
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 1518
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:28 pm
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Re: As nature intended or a smooth operator?
Unshaved even tho I have dark hair. Don't shave when wearing shorts so no need to change the habit for skirts, even short minis.
"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on" - Winston Churchill.
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it" - Joseph Goebbels
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it" - Joseph Goebbels
-
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 12:21 am
Re: As nature intended or a smooth operator?
permanently smooth for me.
used to get em waxed, then after a few years of that routine I changed to IPL/VPL treatments for a permanent removal. Took a year and half for permanent removal - was 8 treatments in the end - full leg & bikini line is always smooth now.
One of the best things I ever did because its just so much easier.
used to get em waxed, then after a few years of that routine I changed to IPL/VPL treatments for a permanent removal. Took a year and half for permanent removal - was 8 treatments in the end - full leg & bikini line is always smooth now.
One of the best things I ever did because its just so much easier.
Re: As nature intended or a smooth operator?
My legs have always been hairless, so I’ve never had to shave or wax or doing any other sort of stuff. For me, that’s. Certainly a good thing as I enjoy being bare legged in the spring and summer, and let me tell you, that’s a blast!
I don't want to LOOK like a woman, I just want to DRESS like a woman.
- victor1964
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 10:37 pm
- Location: Kew, London UK
Re: As nature intended or a smooth operator?
Do we have a bikini line?, if we do I would have no idea where it would be
- Fred in Skirts
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 4015
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:48 pm
- Location: Southeast Corner of Aiken County, SC USA
Re: As nature intended or a smooth operator?
My legs are a patch work with hair and no hair, so I shave just to keep them even and clean.
"It is better to be hated for what you are than be loved for what you are not" Andre Gide: 1869 - 1951
Always be yourself because the people that matter don’t mind and the ones that mind don’t matter.
Always be yourself because the people that matter don’t mind and the ones that mind don’t matter.
Re: As nature intended or a smooth operator?
I don't suppose it really matters. For me, I'm too lazy to shave my face -- bearded since I swore off the corporate world in the 70's, I'm sure as heck not going to add another unnecessary task. Like Sinned, I had hair on my legs when wearing shorts, why not with skirts -- the skirts are for comfort and social statement, not to fawn a look or for gender confusion. I'd buy Jim's answer, "as nature intended", but the ladies are pretty consistent about bending nature, shaving regardless -- conforming to...??? I suspect MIS will be forgiven the 'sin' of hairy legs long before the sin of wearing a skirt!