Page 1 of 1
Re: Let's get stocking companies on our side!
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 1:55 pm
by oldnick2
I was going to say it'd never work, but what do I find?
[url]
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... these.html[/url]
[url]
http://e-mancipate.net/[/url]
still at £70 a pair, they're not going to catch on
(hope I've posted links right)
Re: Let's get stocking companies on our side!
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 4:02 pm
by Since1982
Re: Let's get stocking companies on our side!
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:17 pm
by oldnick2
Thanks for sorting the link
might get the hang of this posting lark one day
Re: Let's get stocking companies on our side!
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 10:27 pm
by FloralSkirt
I really hope this catches on. I will stick to my girl tights myself. But tights in the winter under pants and tights under a skirt in the fall is the cats meow!
Re: Let's get stocking companies on our side!
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:16 am
by RichardA
Re: Let's get stocking companies on our side!
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:03 am
by Since1982
Re: Let's get stocking companies on our side!
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 8:53 am
by floatingmetal
UK Tights doesn't have Men's tartan tights
But the Bonnie Doon brand ones are at least available in a range of sizes, which is a start. Depends if you're looking for ones which actually *say* they're mens.
Re: Let's get stocking companies on our side!
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:10 pm
by Pythos
I couldn't give a fig whether or not they say "mens". The best would be "pantyhose" or "tights" or " legwear". No men's, no Women's just what the item is.
Re: Let's get stocking companies on our side!
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:51 pm
by crfriend
Personally, I think the term "legwear" sums it up best. It's completely gender-neutral and lacks most of the "overload" that the other common terms carry. +1.
