Dresses!

Discussion of fashion elements and looks that are traditionally considered somewhat "femme" but are presented in a masculine context. This is NOT about transvestism or crossdressing.
User avatar
Jack Williams
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 2116
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 2:05 pm
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Dresses!

Post by Jack Williams »

Sarongman wrote:
Sinned wrote: Most of my underwear is black which means it is not noticeable either through my clothes or directly when my knees are raised for whatever reason (falling on my backside, for example!)

Martin
Well theorised and I fully concur with the idea.------ It seems there are two threads called simply "Dresses" and I wonder if it would be tidier if they were merged.
I must take some pictures of my four (soon to be augmented by another four) but will get S.W.M.B.O. to take them as my self portrait attempts are off putting to say the least!
Haven't noticed the other "Dresses" thread...
Not sure how to just quote part of a post, but washed the hair last night.
Ahem, black underwear.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
skirtyscot
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 3504
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:44 pm
Location: West Kilbride, Ayrshire, Scotland
Contact:

Re: Dresses!

Post by skirtyscot »

Jack Williams wrote:Not sure how to just quote part of a post, but washed the hair last night.
It's easy. You simply click on "Quote" and delete the bits you think are not worthy of your witty repartee!
Keep on skirting,

Alastair
User avatar
Sinned
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 5804
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:28 pm
Location: York, England

Re: Dresses!

Post by Sinned »

Silly me. I just assumed that through thin white cotton that white undies would be less noticeable. I'll experiment.
I believe in offering every assistance short of actual help but then mainly just want to be left to be myself in all my difference and uniqueness.
User avatar
Jack Williams
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 2116
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 2:05 pm
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Dresses!

Post by Jack Williams »

Yes, under white a white singlet will show against the darker body, whereas a black one doesn't.
User avatar
Different_Trains
Distinguished Member
Posts: 120
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 3:17 pm

Re: Dresses!

Post by Different_Trains »

In more multi-cultural parts of London, it's quite common to see men walking around nowadays in the traditional Muslim dress of their homelands - the kaftan - to all extents and purposes a dress for men. I wonder if that might be a good starting point to bring the idea into the western consciousness?
User avatar
GerdG
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 433
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 2:16 pm
Location: DK
Contact:

Re: Dresses!

Post by GerdG »

Different_Trains wrote:...it's quite common to see men walking around nowadays in the traditional Muslim dress of their homelands - the kaftan - to all extents and purposes a dress for men. I wonder if that might be a good starting point to bring the idea into the western consciousness?
For various reasons I don't think so.
GerdG

There ARE viable alternatives to trousers.
User avatar
Different_Trains
Distinguished Member
Posts: 120
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 3:17 pm

Re: Dresses!

Post by Different_Trains »

GerdG wrote:
Different_Trains wrote:...it's quite common to see men walking around nowadays in the traditional Muslim dress of their homelands - the kaftan - to all extents and purposes a dress for men. I wonder if that might be a good starting point to bring the idea into the western consciousness?
For various reasons I don't think so.
What reasons?
justfred
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:22 pm

Re: Dresses!

Post by justfred »

"What reasons"?

My guess is because wearing anything that looks foreign is believed to be even more offensive to some people, than wearing something vaguely feminine.
BobM
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 242
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 6:14 pm
Location: Ellenboro, NC

Re: Dresses!

Post by BobM »

GerdG wrote:
Different_Trains wrote:...it's quite common to see men walking around nowadays in the traditional Muslim dress of their homelands - the kaftan - to all extents and purposes a dress for men. I wonder if that might be a good starting point to bring the idea into the western consciousness?
For various reasons I don't think so.
I don't either.
Ordained Deacon and Ruling Elder, Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church.
Grok
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 3304
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:21 am

Re: Dresses!

Post by Grok »

Most likely to be categorized as an ethnic thing, just as it is assumed that wearing a kilt must be for a Scottish heritage thing. If an apparent exception can be so categorized, it can be dismissed.
User avatar
GerdG
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 433
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 2:16 pm
Location: DK
Contact:

Re: Dresses!

Post by GerdG »

Different_Trains wrote:
GerdG wrote:
Different_Trains wrote:...it's quite common to see men walking around nowadays in the traditional Muslim dress of their homelands - the kaftan - to all extents and purposes a dress for men. I wonder if that might be a good starting point to bring the idea into the western consciousness?
For various reasons I don't think so.
What reasons?
I'm happy being part of Western culture and the possibilities it gives me. Besides I don't like the look of the garments referred to.
GerdG

There ARE viable alternatives to trousers.
User avatar
couyalair
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 957
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:55 pm
Location: Malaga or Grenoble

Re: Dresses!

Post by couyalair »

I don't find long middle eastern robes very elegant, but I used to wear a Moroccan jellaba which is thick and wooly. Very comfortable for long jouneys in a car, as you can turn the heating down and feel unfettered. A close-fitting overcoat gets uncomfortable and does not keep your feet warm. On the other hand, it's a nuisance round the lower legs when walking, imho.

I do not feel that foreign garments are likely to make skirt-wearing acceptable in the western world, given the present atmosphere of mistrust that the extremists have created.

Martin
User avatar
JohnH
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 1299
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:46 am
Location: Irving, (DFW area) Texas USA

Re: Dresses!

Post by JohnH »

couyalair wrote:
I do not feel that foreign garments are likely to make skirt-wearing acceptable in the western world, given the present atmosphere of mistrust that the extremists have created.

Martin
I start mentioning getting a Middle Eastern robe to my wife, and she reminds me it would not be a good idea since 9/11. That's too bad - that would have been a solution for men wanting to wear a dress like garment. My wife prefers me to wear traditional Western men's garments rather than dresses or skirts, but she would ABSOLUTELY not permit me to wear a Middle Eastern robe. At least I can wear dresses without any alterations.

John
I renounce the Great Male Renunciation!!!
User avatar
crfriend
Master Barista
Posts: 15137
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: New England (U.S.)
Contact:

Re: Dresses!

Post by crfriend »

JohnH wrote:I start mentioning getting a Middle Eastern robe to my wife, and she reminds me it would not be a good idea since 9/11. That's too bad - that would have been a solution for men wanting to wear a dress like garment.
This speaks more to cultural ignorance than anything else -- and that ignorance needs to be fought tooth and nail. There is vastly more that binds us together as a species than what popular perception -- which is fraught with propaganda, mistrust, and outright lies -- has on offer. We need to rise above the misconceptions if we really want to survive as a species.

The above having been said, it's easy to see how traditional middle- (and far-) eastern garments can "draw fire"; the modern Western mind-set is bent of vilifying anything other than its own view of things, and I find that tragic.
My wife prefers me to wear traditional Western men's garments rather than dresses or skirts, but she would ABSOLUTELY not permit me to wear a Middle Eastern robe.
This is completely unsurprising, and should come as no shock whatever to any guy who's contemplated "shoving both legs down one pipe". However, with the added overlay of propaganda, hype, and fear the absolute position becomes understandable -- even if the objection is completely pointless.
At least I can wear dresses without any alterations.
If you have the body type for it, rock the look.
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
User avatar
couyalair
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 957
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:55 pm
Location: Malaga or Grenoble

Re: Dresses!

Post by couyalair »

In any case, middle easterners cheat (imho) : they wear trousers under their robes. In the height of summer, men can be seen in North Africa in sleeveless robes (foquia, jebba) with little else, but it's not usual.

Traditionally, the trousers would be very loose, perhaps with a low hanging crotch. Today, however, it's just as likely to be tight jeans. How on earth they perform ritual genuflexions and crouching in tight garments without suffering scrotal torture I do not know.

Martin
Post Reply