Re: Leggings
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2024 6:58 am
Just for clarity, tights or bare legs for me, definitely no leggings ever!
Steve.
Steve.
Skirt Cafe is an on-line community dedicated to exploring, promoting and advocating skirts and kilts as a fashion choice for men. We do this in the context of men's fashion freedom --- an expansion of choices beyond those commonly available for men to inc
http://www.skirtcafe.org/forums/
Bare legs are footless so the thickness must be the issue ......... too much like pants I guess.Barleymower wrote: βWed Jul 17, 2024 8:33 am Late to the party but aren't they just footless thick tights?
Years ago I had a pair of Ronhills that had a loop under the foot but who wears Ronhills track master classics anymore? They are practically leggings! So gay.Mouse wrote: βWed Jul 17, 2024 10:11 am I have always thought of leggings as thick tights, where the thickness gives the user the option of not wearing a skirt to cover the interesting bits. Whether the garment covers the foot, or there is just a loop under the foot, or nothing, is just a detail of a particular pair.
I think that a woman's tunic would go well with leggings. Adding a bit of modesty.Mouse wrote: βWed Jul 17, 2024 10:11 am I have always thought of leggings as thick tights, where the thickness gives the user the option of not wearing a skirt to cover the interesting bits. Whether the garment covers the foot, or there is just a loop under the foot, or nothing, is just a detail of a particular pair.
Yes it does look good on both men and women. However, it does have a sci-fi look about it with the leggings as it reminds me of the costumes on Blakeβs 7 or 1970βs Doctor Who.
That LOOP under the foot makes the tights/leggings/pants = "Stirrup Pants" - commonly found in ski wear.Mouse wrote: βWed Jul 17, 2024 10:11 am I have always thought of leggings as thick tights, where the thickness gives the user the option of not wearing a skirt to cover the interesting bits. Whether the garment covers the foot, or there is just a loop under the foot, or nothing, is just a detail of a particular pair.
Exactly, "ski pants", they were form fitting and quite thick, sometimes fleece lined.r.m.anderson wrote: βWed Jul 17, 2024 7:54 pm hat LOOP under the foot makes the tights/leggings/pants = "Stirrup Pants" - commonly found in ski wear.
While snow skis don't work well in the summer and stirrup pants are a bit of overkillSTEVIE wrote: βThu Jul 18, 2024 5:35 amExactly, "ski pants", they were form fitting and quite thick, sometimes fleece lined.r.m.anderson wrote: βWed Jul 17, 2024 7:54 pm hat LOOP under the foot makes the tights/leggings/pants = "Stirrup Pants" - commonly found in ski wear.
This may seem strange, but snow is actually cold, skis don't work so well in summer.
Steve.