Page 3 of 3
Re: Womens underwear
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 10:45 pm
by rode_kater
Brad wrote: ↑Mon Jan 18, 2021 9:44 pm
I've been to ballet performances where the male dancers wear dance tights that show a male profile. This is an artistic performance and not normal street wear. However people do not seem offended by it.
To be honest, if I look out the window I see plenty of guys jogging in leggings and the "package" is often visible. Don't think anyone actually cares. I recall a running skirt site talking about "won't people laugh at me?" with the answer "they already are"
What passes for athletic wear these days...
That said, this is Europe, where we don't fetishise human bodies quite so much as in the US.
Re: Womens underwear
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 5:42 am
by denimini
Epiceneguy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 18, 2021 8:56 am
Wouldn't it be possible to include a new forum for such conversations, just a thought.
There is a throng of them on the internet already, with many loose threads.
Mike wrote: ↑Wed Jan 20, 2021 7:00 pm
I dunno, are pantyhose underwear? A portion of them are purposely exposed. Things that make you say hmm.
What is not seen is but the part that is seen isn't :}
Re: Womens underwear
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:00 am
by Kirbstone
No. Tom
Re: Womens underwear
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 12:43 pm
by Rokje
Within 5 months I will be wearing womens underwear all day long for the rest of my life.
Re: Womens underwear
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 1:19 pm
by crfriend
Enough, guys. If it's above the hemline and not intended to be in view or alter the external shape of the skirt it's "unmentionable".
Seriously, there's a reason for this. I watched as the old USENET (Remember that?) forum alt.fashion almost got taken over by discussion of "pnaties" -- and it was a hard fight to get it back on the rails. This was right around the time that Tom's Cafe was starting up, having been pretty much tossed in the purges to alt.fashion. I do not want to see this place get overrun like that.