Milfmog wrote:I tend to agree with Iain, most people would see the lad pictured, notice a tartan and decide it's a kilt. If they noticed the wrap direction I'd be very surprised. As for the length, if they thought it too long they'd probably decide that his parents had gone a size large because kids that age grow like weeds. I very much doubt that more than a tiny fraction of people would think he was wearing "a lassie's kilted skirt".
It must be an 'age', or, 'culture' thing, then!

Or, does society these days, really go around with 'closed eyes'? I really think, for once(!!), you are doing Joe/Jane Public a dis-service!
I don't 'buy' the argument that 'tartan = Kilt', I have to say, although I can see that where Kilts are
not commonplace, this could be so. I've always found that most Scots, on the other hand, whether Kilt-wearers or no, are extremely 'perceptive' where Kilts are concerned, and inclined to be 'hyper-critical' (as far as most non-Scots would see it :rolleyes: ) on the subject!
It reminds me of a couple of years ago, when one of my wife's friend's lads had been given a part in a school play which required a Kilt to be worn (Parents were responsible for their own kids' costumes). She picked up a girl's 'kilted skirt' at a charity shop and was really pleased with the bargain. However, the young lad, only 7 years old, point blank refused to wear it. When she asked "Why?", "Because it
'fastens the girl's way'!" A half hour later, after a session on the sewing machine, the 'kilted skirt' became a 'Kilt' (even though the pleats still ran
'the wrong way'!). Result: One happy chappy (
especially when he won the prize for best costume! :cheer: )! The point being, of course, that he was just a little kid, living in deepest England with scant 'exposure' to Kilts, but only too well aware of what a 'Kilt'
should look like!