Men's Health Issues and/or Concerns

[mr seamstress]

Regarding Deuteronomy 22:5 - "A woman shall not wear a man’s clothing, nor shall a man put on a woman’s clothing; for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God."

How many times do we need to retrace this primrose path? It's getting tiresome. (1) Deuteronmy is an Old Testament chapter, and thus is obsolete doctrine as it's been replaced by the New Testament. (2) The entire thing hinges of a botched translation in the King James Bible on the matter of attire. (3) The thing is an extended parable about deception. If there is no deception intended, then the strictures DO NOT APPLY.

We repeat these idiot words at our own cost. Let us not forget that. Thus, of all people, we should be the ones trying to educate the unwashed masses that surround and bully us. It has become a cudgel used to beat men with. Let's not empower that!

Crfriend, sir I agree with you these scriptures doesn't apply to us men from wearing skirts, dress, or other attire that man deem female. It's old and tiresome that that right extremist keep pushing as though it does and we have to turn around and show the truth.
By not mentioning Deuteronomy as same as saying that right ring extremist is right. Did you Know that right ring extremist was able to silence Victoria Secret from not having men on the runway here in 2024? To me this is like making Victoria Secret agreeing with right ring extremist that it is wrong in having men wearing bras.
As I make case there are reasons why we should be able to wear bras and should still be able to wear them and even for no medical reason at all, that Deuteronomy doesn't apply. We all end up keep mentioning Deuteronomy until we can get idiots understand these scriptures.

By the way I sent an email to my pastor explain to him how we men have right to wear all garments and Deuteronomy doesn't apply to his opinion what is male and female clothing. Further I stated There will be no service and nor clergy for my funeral, as long the clergy tells man has no right to any garment. By the way the church I go to allows men wear dresses and skirts, but still condemns us in death, because of Deuteronomy.
I have no intention allowing anyone completely in silencing me in discussing or showing how Deuteronomy doesn't apply the way current men uses the scriptures from it. We become like Victoria Secret refuses to acknowledge men who wears their products for various reasons (silent). Being silent will not help us about how Deuteronomy being used against us, even as it gets old and tiresome. It only helps right ring extremist and Victoria Secret is helping right ring extremist by not allowing men on the runway.

[crfriend]

As I make case there are reasons why we should be able to wear bras and should still be able to wear them and even for no medical reason at all, that Deuteronomy doesn't apply. We all end up keep mentioning Deuteronomy until we can get idiots understand these scriptures.

Most men have no need to wear such garments as they are entirely superfluous to our normal anatomy. However, guys who do have the condition "get it" that the things can bounce around and cause distress (in several ways), and the the usage of the garment is entirely appropriate.

By the way I sent an email to my pastor explain to him how we men have right to wear all garments and Deuteronomy doesn't apply to his opinion what is male and female clothing. Further I stated There will be no service and nor clergy for my funeral, as long the clergy tells man has no right to any garment. By the way the church I go to allows men wear dresses and skirts, but still condemns us in death, because of Deuteronomy.

I hope that when he "meets his maker", he meets one who is angry with him for making others of "his creation" more uncomfortable and condemns him to a "warm lodging". That'd be justice.

For the most part, fashion and style are about adornment and not function. Brassieres are about function whether they have lace and frills or are basic engineering designs. They are not the same thing. Faced with it, I'd ask anybody that doesn't have to for functional purposes, "Why?", but not if the necessity is obvious. And, ultimately, "because I like to" is an honest excuse.

[Ray]

Sorry, Mouse. I think I triggered the subject change.

I don’t have Gynecomastia and I do not need a bra.

[Uncle Al]

You seem pretty certain about that. Do you have proof there is no God?

Prove me wrong.

I didn't make an assertion so I don't have to prove anything.

You did make an assertion, i.e. that there is no God. The onus is upon you to substantiate it.

I quoted the complete post because this points to a question:

What does this post have to do with the topic
"Gynecomastia (Man Boobs)"

This is a health issue concerning men

Get back ON-TOPIC or this vital and informative thread will get locked.

Uncle Al

[Uncle Al]

UPDATE

This "topic" is open for discussion about issues men face with their health.
Not only is this for, or about, Gynecomastia but to include any type of cancer.

Why men do not seek medical assistance from a doctor when something goes wrong

Why do men have to be stubborn and stoic about these things

You are not less of a man when you seek medical help

Let's talk about this

( Note - most religious and political comments have been removed. )

Uncle Al

[Mouse]

Uncle Al, now you have stopped the thread and hacked it, I would like to remove my post from the thread because it no longer makes any sense http://www.skirtcafe.org/forums/memberl ... le&u=39896

[shadowfax]

Uncle Al, now you have stopped the thread and hacked it, I would like to remove my post from the thread because it no longer makes any sense http://www.skirtcafe.org/forums/memberl ... le&u=39896

Maybe Ray's response to Mouse's post should be deleted too, Uncle Al?
Then please delete my and Mouse's posts suggesting these amendments.