hehe, the latter.Milfmog wrote:Was that a typo or deliberate?Kilted_John wrote: crapi pants
Have fun,
Ian.

-J
hehe, the latter.Milfmog wrote:Was that a typo or deliberate?Kilted_John wrote: crapi pants
Have fun,
Ian.
Despite being absolutely ignorant do the people and personalities involved, I would point out that very few people feel as your MOH says your kids feel. So the chances that they both feel that way are very small.Sinned wrote:MOH even said "The kids have said that they would rather put their children in care than have you look after them because of your skirt wearing."
Hi SS - funny you should say that as a few neighbours from our street must have seen me in a skirt at some time or other over the last 3 years. One woman lives with her daughter (I presume separated from spouse) has seen me locally and I have chatted with her on occasions when they have looked in on their horse which they keep in a nearby field. Another neighbour walks his dog and must have noticed me in a skirt when I was cycling home through wooded paths (met him in passing on a couple of occasions).skirtyscot wrote:ST, why don't you let the neighbours, golf buddies, etc know, and then you will find out? Unlikely to be as bad as she implies.
Men, also, are usually more dependent on workplace attitudes than women. Women have laws on their side; men do not. This puts the man who dares to "step one foot outside the box" at serious risk of his livelihood.BobM wrote:For some obscure reason men apparently crave approval from everyone else at the expense of their own happiness.
To me, it seems the other way around: that women seem more unsure and crave more approval than men. They certainly complain about lack of attention more than men do.crfriend wrote:Men, also, are usually more dependent on workplace attitudes than women. Women have laws on their side; men do not. This puts the man who dares to "step one foot outside the box" at serious risk of his livelihood.BobM wrote:For some obscure reason men apparently crave approval from everyone else at the expense of their own happiness.
That merely points up how screwed up the legal system is.Caultron wrote:And a recent article in the news reported a wrongful-termination lawsuit against a man who fired his female assistant because she aroused him too much. She wasn't wearing short skirts or see-through blouses, and she wasn't flirting, he just liked her too much in a way he couldn't deal with. And the court upheld the termination!
Indeed, but it's worth noting that those decisions may have ramifications long after the initial uptake.But we all have to make our own decisions, and accept or reject the limitations, consequences, and trade-offs we find ourselves in.
That'll only happen if the legal system mandates it. Livelihoods mean nothing in the overall scheme of things (legal).Grok wrote:I suspect that changes will come last to the work place. Partly because of formal dress codes, but mostly because your livelihood is on the line.
I'll be long dead by then. Hell, I may be dead next week.Grok wrote:Unfortunately, change through the legal system may be very long in coming. Perhaps change will be seen by the great-grandchildren of members-during the 22nd century.