Newsweek: Bad Bunny Wearing Dress for Super Bowl Show Sparks Fury
- crfriend
- Master Barista
- Posts: 15416
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
- Location: New England (U.S.)
- Contact:
Re: Newsweek: Bad Bunny Wearing Dress for Super Bowl Show Sparks Fury
Here, I'm going to invoke my usual observation about such machinations and ask, "Who is {foo}, and why should I care?"
I don't "follow" "celebrities", starlets, jocks, talking heads, or sports -- all being entirely irrelevant to my existence and life. I'm not going to watch the Super Bowl for the simple reasons that (1) I'm going to be pinned down by a storm, (2) it's irrelevant to my existence. and (3) I'm one of the few that does not have a working TV at home (because there's nothing on).
For stuff that's important, I've got very robust connectivity with the real world. For stuff that isn't important, I have no problem with disconnecting from it. What some random celebrity is touting this week simply winds up in the "round file". If I'm curious about the actual score on The Game, then I can look it up; the ancillary stuff is nothing but noise.
Bruce Springsteen remarked some years ago about television is "57 channels and nothing on". It hasn't changed one lick since Newton Minow's time (a "vast wasteland"). If anything, it's gotten worse.
I don't "follow" "celebrities", starlets, jocks, talking heads, or sports -- all being entirely irrelevant to my existence and life. I'm not going to watch the Super Bowl for the simple reasons that (1) I'm going to be pinned down by a storm, (2) it's irrelevant to my existence. and (3) I'm one of the few that does not have a working TV at home (because there's nothing on).
For stuff that's important, I've got very robust connectivity with the real world. For stuff that isn't important, I have no problem with disconnecting from it. What some random celebrity is touting this week simply winds up in the "round file". If I'm curious about the actual score on The Game, then I can look it up; the ancillary stuff is nothing but noise.
Bruce Springsteen remarked some years ago about television is "57 channels and nothing on". It hasn't changed one lick since Newton Minow's time (a "vast wasteland"). If anything, it's gotten worse.
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
-
Coder
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 3039
- Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2019 4:40 am
- Location: Southeast Michigan
Re: Newsweek: Bad Bunny Wearing Dress for Super Bowl Show Sparks Fury
I have a slightly more positive outlook. Not so much that one celebrity will turn the tides, or that an influencer's power will change people's opinions.
What I hope comes from these sorts of things are discussions. Maybe conversations that happen at the dinner table. The cynic in me says those will be dismissive conversations, jesting at Bad Bunny's chosen outfit. The optimist in me says it will give men courage to discuss this topic - especially men who are inclined to wear a skirt, or such things.
What I hope comes from these sorts of things are discussions. Maybe conversations that happen at the dinner table. The cynic in me says those will be dismissive conversations, jesting at Bad Bunny's chosen outfit. The optimist in me says it will give men courage to discuss this topic - especially men who are inclined to wear a skirt, or such things.
Re: Newsweek: Bad Bunny Wearing Dress for Super Bowl Show Sparks Fury
This isn't news. He spoke about wearing one during Halftime. Even without the dress, these same knuckle-dragging anti-"woke" dingbats hate him for being a Puerto Rican "non-American" who sang a song entirely in Spanish. It's so ridiculous. These ******* idiots don't even know that Puerto Rico is A PART of America, making HIM a U.S. citizen by default. Just more racist misogyny from the party that continues to foster it. I hate people and I especially hate this country.
Re: Newsweek: Bad Bunny Wearing Dress for Super Bowl Show Sparks Fury
At the risk of going off at a tangent, I'd say that's because you haven't got a properly-funded public broadcaster, like nearly all western European countries have. That way you get programmes designed to meet the interests and needs of audiences rather than advertisers. And that exerts an influence on the whole broadcasting ecosystem.
- crfriend
- Master Barista
- Posts: 15416
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:52 pm
- Location: New England (U.S.)
- Contact:
Re: Newsweek: Bad Bunny Wearing Dress for Super Bowl Show Sparks Fury
I'd say that thesis is bang on.
We used to have one, but that was sacrificed on the Altar of Greed by the current regime (and possibly because Big Bird was regarded as queer). It'll never recover, and the population will be measurably poorer for it. Gone forever are masterpieces like NOVA, Cosmos, Masterpiece Theatre, and dozens of other exemplars. Such a shame. But expected.
Retrocomputing -- It's not just a job, it's an adventure!
Re: Newsweek: Bad Bunny Wearing Dress for Super Bowl Show Sparks Fury
There are periods of cultural excellence, brilliant periods showing much promise.
The present isn't one of them.
I'm glad I got to see one, the 1960s/1970s. Many young adults haven't had such luck.
The present isn't one of them.
I'm glad I got to see one, the 1960s/1970s. Many young adults haven't had such luck.
Re: Newsweek: Bad Bunny Wearing Dress for Super Bowl Show Sparks Fury
Do we have to discuss political topics that have nothing what so ever to do with the purpose of this forum?
Woman have Fashion, Men have a Uniform.
A skirt wearer since 2004 and a full time skirt wearer since 2020.
A skirt wearer since 2004 and a full time skirt wearer since 2020.
-
Ray
- Member Extraordinaire
- Posts: 1917
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 7:03 am
- Location: West Midlands, England, UK
Re: Newsweek: Bad Bunny Wearing Dress for Super Bowl Show Sparks Fury
The commentary above provides context to the subject matter. I don’t have a problem with it.
Re: Newsweek: Bad Bunny Wearing Dress for Super Bowl Show Sparks Fury
If a woman were to wear a man’s suit and tie and perform at the Superbowl, would all of the outrage be occurring?