It's also a dog food.

It has been suggested that democracy can not work. Humans will inevitably vote for their own destruction.
Democracies work, but they only work when they have a large, intelligent, and engaged constituency. The US at the moment has none of those. Whilst, yes, the population is large, we've been being systematically dumbed-down by those in power, viciously divided over silly partisan squabbles designed to separate us and make us hate each other (divide and conquer) and a political system that guarantees that if you weren't born with a billion dollar trust fund you have no say at the political table. Voting has become meaningless because all the major candidates answer to the same paymasters -- ant that paymaster is not the citizenry.moonshadow wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 1:14 pmIt has been suggested that democracy can not work. Humans will inevitably vote for their own destruction.
The US had a collective stroke in 1980 from which it never recovered. By 2000, the cards were clearly on the table: The USA is an oligarchy just as sure as Russia and China are -- and will be very difficult to "take back", if it even can be now.I think the U.S. proves this beyond a shadow of a doubt.
I try not to sound apathetic, but really, what can I do?
There's the tragedy. There is precisely nothing the general population can do to change the trajectory short of an all-up revolution -- which I DO NOT advocate because revolutions tend to produce "less than optimal" results. Witness the October, 1917 revolution that brought the Soviet Union into being; witness the sad events of the Arab Spring that remains fresh in everybody's memory. Even the US Revolution wound up producing an oligarchy in the end. So much for high hopes, lofty goals, and fantastic rhetoric.
I think the end (of our country in particular) is nigh and inevitable. It's human nature. A new nation will rise out of the ashes, will it be freedom based, or authoritarian? Time will tell. If we manage to survive into the 3,000's then I suspect free and totalitarian states will come and go as they normally do. Note that both the hard right and the hard left are both authoritarian in nature, they just hold you to a different set of standards, but you are held to them no less, and by no free will of your own.
With all respect, I do think you are doing a bit of a Lewis Hamilton in respect of the Dutch Political history.rode_kater wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 8:28 pm I also wonder how the US can be fixed. Here in NL we also had a period of radical polarisation and identity politics and populism in the beginning of the 20th century, though at the time it was catholics vs protestants vs liberals vs socialists. It lasted on and off for 50 years and ended in 1917 in what is called "the pacification" which radically changed the political landscape and which evolved to become the political system we have today.
But this was without social media, constitutional change was much easier and in a much smaller country. There's a new wave of populism since about 20 years, but it's basically stuck at 20% of the parliament so it doesn't screw the system up so much. How the hell the US is supposed to get out of it, I can't even guess.
Yes, 17 parties in parliament sounds like a lot, but it is representative. Even the nutty anti-vax people have got support from about a proportional number of people in parliament. There's even a farmers party (1 seat). You can complain about many things, but you can't say you're not represented. And I guess most importantly, party donations don't matter so much.
IF, you want to stipulate that it is possible to make a "well motivated" choice to be an 'anti-vaxer' based on the the information available, I might in that fantasy land story grant their choice was "well motivated" but still abhorrently stupid and selfish. Many a murder is carried out by "well-motivated" persons -- it is not to be respected. It is long past time to call a Spade and Spade. Failure to get vaccinated at this time, if it is available to you, is nothing short of criminal, unless perhaps you are a hermit--then you might not know better!by Gusto10 » Mon Jul 26, 2021 3:36 pm
As to qualifying all anti-vaxers as nutty. If someone has done his research and concluded that there are to many contradictions in the available information, that information which must be provided in accordance with international treaties is not provided and doesn't buy propoganda, is such a person nutty? I don't think so. If a choice is well motivated it should be respected.
And nothing of value was lostTheRod wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 7:10 am Another existential threat to humanity that gets limited publicity: the projected fertility of humans is zero by 2045. See https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... dApp_Other
As is indicated in resolution 2361 of the European Parlement, NOBODY may be forced IN WHATEVER WAY to be vaccinated. MORAL pressure is prohibited as it's discriminatory.Faldaguy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 5:12 amIF, you want to stipulate that it is possible to make a "well motivated" choice to be an 'anti-vaxer' based on the the information available, I might in that fantasy land story grant their choice was "well motivated" but still abhorrently stupid and selfish. Many a murder is carried out by "well-motivated" persons -- it is not to be respected. It is long past time to call a Spade and Spade. Failure to get vaccinated at this time, if it is available to you, is nothing short of criminal, unless perhaps you are a hermit--then you might not know better!by Gusto10 » Mon Jul 26, 2021 3:36 pm
As to qualifying all anti-vaxers as nutty. If someone has done his research and concluded that there are to many contradictions in the available information, that information which must be provided in accordance with international treaties is not provided and doesn't buy propoganda, is such a person nutty? I don't think so. If a choice is well motivated it should be respected.
Zero fertility on 25 years?TheRod wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 7:10 am Another existential threat to humanity that gets limited publicity: the projected fertility of humans is zero by 2045. See https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... dApp_Other
That will give other species a better go. I think that evolution will take place so that humans that have less contact with toxins, radiation or whatever the cause will become the more prominant population .......... there might be some truth in the saying "the meek shall inherit the Earth" (I'm actually not religious). It is a beautiful planet and we are stuffing it up at an exponential rate.TheRod wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 7:10 am Another existential threat to humanity that gets limited publicity: the projected fertility of humans is zero by 2045. See https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... dApp_Other