
All, I repeat ALL breasts should be allowed to see the light of day and nothing should ever be said about it. No laws should be written or passed that forbid the showing of the breast. Equality of the breasts is what I am for.
LET THERE BE BREASTS![]()




LET THERE BE BREASTS![]()
LOLDaryl wrote:At least not without the consent of the owner of the breasts...Caultron wrote:Oh, and, hmm, just to stay on topic, I don't think men shouldn't try to breastfeed even if they're wearing a skirt.
I was speaking of the whole breast not just the cleavage. The whole breast consists of the nipple, the areola, and the resulting skin around them.Sinned wrote:Fred, point of detail. Breasts are on display all the time - it just depends on how much. You should see some of the cleavages I see in an average day. What should be freed is not the breast - it's the nipple. That relatively small ( some are undoubtedly larger than others ) and protuberant nipple and ( all shades of ) brown area surrounding it, the areola, seems to cause more consternation than is warranted. Everyone has two ( at least ) and it's hardly a shock to see them. So yes, free the nipple.
Sounds like a great outing! Congratulations and keep,it up!Feeling freedom wrote:...All was great! The day was enjoyed and I bought a gift for my wife.
I'd have assured her the label was in the back.STEVIE wrote:On way to work today, a youngish girl, "Nice skirt, but back to front"?
Answer, "thanks and no it isn't".
She was young enough not to recognise a kick pleat.
Nice encounter.
I've seen skirts with kick pleats in front. No reason to think they're in any way unusual.skirtyscot wrote:That's a bit surprising. Surely she must have seen a straight skirt with a kick pleat; they aren't that unusual. And why on earth would a kick pleat go at the front?