CHOGM

General discussion of skirt and kilt-based fashion for men, and stuff that goes with skirts and kilts.
Sarongman
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 1049
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:59 am
Location: Australia

CHOGM

Post by Sarongman »

Acronym for Commonwealth heads of Government Meeting or, more cynically, Chaps Holidaying on Government Money! I append the photo, as the host for this year, Sri Lanka, despite human rights problems is, for the next six months, the chairman of the Commonwealth. You will notice how mine host stands out in his white dress against the dreary sea of grey suits. Charlie's suit probably cost more than most of those there but, in the end, it's still a dreary suit.
CHOGM.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
It will not always be summer: build barns---Hesiod
User avatar
Jack Williams
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 2116
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 2:05 pm
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: CHOGM

Post by Jack Williams »

To tell the trouth, I've never worn a sut in my life.
User avatar
Kirbstone
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 5801
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 7:55 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: CHOGM

Post by Kirbstone »

I've never worn a sut either! :lol: However, A lot of professional activity I get up to requires me to wear something smart like a SUIT.....a trouser suit. :blue:

Tom K.
Carpe Diem......Seize the Day !
User avatar
norstdresses
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 206
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:26 am
Location: Botswana

Re: CHOGM

Post by norstdresses »

you are so lucky. A suit is the most uncomfortable garment I have worn. Here in Botswana, for all official meetings with or without air-con you are requested to wear suit and tie. :(
I remember my work stay in Yemen. Our official outfit was long and white. No pants at all

have a nice dressed weekend
User avatar
Jack Williams
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 2116
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 2:05 pm
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: CHOGM

Post by Jack Williams »

Well as a disparaging epithet, we always used to call them suts!
skirtilator
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 183
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: CHOGM

Post by skirtilator »

Kirbstone wrote:I've never worn a sut either! :lol: However, A lot of professional activity I get up to requires me to wear something smart like a SUIT.....a trouser suit. :blue:

Tom K.
A suit is for penguins only and only something smart if you turn it into a skirt suit with tights. :)
User avatar
Milfmog
Moderator
Posts: 2233
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Buckinghamshire, UK

Re: CHOGM

Post by Milfmog »

skirtilator wrote:A suit is for penguins only and only something smart if you turn it into a skirt suit with tights. :)
I believe the Taliban always deal in absolutes too.

In my opinion, your statement is no more sensible or tolerant than that of the "men can't wear skirts" brigade. I will reserve the choice to dress as I please, whether that be a suit and tie, t-shirt and jeans, a kilt, a skirt or nothing at all. It's my choice, not yours, and I will choose what feels right for the time and place.

Have fun (and allow others to enjoy themselves too),


Ian.
Do not argue with idiots; they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Cogito ergo sum - Descartes
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce
User avatar
skirtyscot
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 3541
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:44 pm
Location: West Kilbride, Ayrshire, Scotland
Contact:

Re: CHOGM

Post by skirtyscot »

skirtilator wrote:A suit is for penguins only and only something smart if you turn it into a skirt suit with tights. :)
Nonsense, man! You could have a long skirt suit and wear socks.
Keep on skirting,

Alastair
User avatar
Sinned
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 5804
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:28 pm
Location: York, England

Re: CHOGM

Post by Sinned »

Since when did you see a penguin in a brown jacket, yellow shirt, tie and yellow trousers? If you did then it was an extremely rare one!!!! I agree with Ian that someone so bigoted to say that you shouldn't ever wear trousers is as bad as those who say that you shouldn't ever wear a skirt. Like Ian I reserve to wear what I want when I want ( MOH's permission granted ) whether it is shorts, trousers, suit or a skirt/kilt. Those of you that don't ever want to wear trousers then that's fine - it's your choice but please leave others of us to wear trousers or a suit or a skirt whenever we feel like. :(

I have had a thought for a while that if I were to ever order another suit ( I have outgrown some of my existing suits ) that I would order a skirt to go with it - jacket, waistcoat, trousers and skirt. I try and imagine the tailor's face with that order! ( I presume that a tailor who can make trousers would find a skirt a piece of cake. )

On a lighter note MOH has got some extended hours in the run up to Christmas so I should get a little more skirt wearing outside in. If I, as a skirt wearer, are different to 999,999 who don't then surely I am one in a million! :D
I believe in offering every assistance short of actual help but then mainly just want to be left to be myself in all my difference and uniqueness.
Sarongman
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 1049
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:59 am
Location: Australia

Re: CHOGM

Post by Sarongman »

If Fiji hadn't been expelled from the Commonwealth, because of the military dictatorship of Admiral Bananas in Pyjamas(Frank Bainimarama), there would have been a well tailored skirt suit in that photograph. I still have the desire to go there and order a suit from one of their good, and reasonably priced, tailors.
It will not always be summer: build barns---Hesiod
skirtingseattle
Active Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:42 am
Location: Bassano del Grappa, VI, Italy

Re: CHOGM

Post by skirtingseattle »

I just returned from 2 weeks in Myanmar (formerly Burma) where the vast majority of males wear the lungi (pronounced there as: LONE gee). Males wear pants predominantly in Yangon (formerly Rangoon) and Mandalay, and in other parts of the country wherever there was a requirement for an official work uniform, like hotels and banks. I wore a lungi about 50% of the time and hiking pants with the zip off legs the other 50%. Short pants were a pain because of the need to cover up frequently when visiting the various religious sites - and it didn't make sense to put it on and then take it off. In addition, to be respectful of the modesty requirements of the locals, it would not have been entirely appropriate to dress and undress in public by taking the lungi on and off.

I have to say I was really happy to be wearing an un-bifurcated garment in the hot and humid weather. The last time I was wearing a sarong was in Sri Lanka in 2009.

If anyone loves South East Asia and hasn't been to either Myanmar or Sri Lanka, don't wait, especially in the case of Myanmar. I know that everything will be different in 20 years as Myanmar is poised to sprint into its economic future very quickly. Myanmar today is like Singapore was 40 years ago and Thailand 25 years ago. Go and see it before the massive sweep of modernization. All of the old practices of the ethnic tribal groups will go extinct as many of the most unusual can only be seen in men and women of 60+ years of age (like the Chin women and full face tattoos, or the Shan women with the neck extending brass necklaces).

Upcoming trips in S.E. Asia will be to Laos and Cambodia (the final 2 countries on our list of the Theravada Buddhist countries).

Chris
User avatar
Jack Williams
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 2116
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 2:05 pm
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: CHOGM

Post by Jack Williams »

I always thought it was back to being "Burma"
User avatar
Milfmog
Moderator
Posts: 2233
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Buckinghamshire, UK

Re: CHOGM

Post by Milfmog »

Jack Williams wrote:I always thought it was back to being "Burma"
It rather depends who you ask! The following paragraph (shamelessly stolen from Wikipedia) may help:
In 1989, the military government officially changed the English translations of many names dating back to Burma's colonial period, including that of the country itself: "Burma" became "Myanmar". The renaming remains a contested issue.[23] Many political and ethnic opposition groups and countries continue to use "Burma" because they do not recognise the legitimacy of the ruling military government or its authority to rename the country.
Have fun,


Ian.
Do not argue with idiots; they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Cogito ergo sum - Descartes
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce
User avatar
Jack Williams
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 2116
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 2:05 pm
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: CHOGM

Post by Jack Williams »

That certainly covers it. I notice the radio news etc here have gone back to "Burma".
User avatar
skirtyscot
Member Extraordinaire
Posts: 3541
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:44 pm
Location: West Kilbride, Ayrshire, Scotland
Contact:

Re: CHOGM

Post by skirtyscot »

They can change the name of their country if they like, but how can they change the English translation of it? Surely that is for us to do, or not. There is no reason why the English name for a country should be the same as the local name. Nobody tells us we should call Germany "Deutschland" or FInland "Suomi".
Keep on skirting,

Alastair
Post Reply