ROMPERS. . . AARGghhhh!

Discussion of fashion elements and looks that are traditionally considered somewhat "femme" but are presented in a masculine context. This is NOT about transvestism or crossdressing.

Re: ROMPERS

Postby Bertino56 » Sun Jul 09, 2017 9:33 pm

I had these back in the 1970s. They were never called "rompers" then.
They were a short-arm, short-leg version of jumpsuits, made and sold
by the makers of regular jumpsuits. One of my favorites was towel-like
terrycloth, with a clasp belt, just like the James Bond picture above.
Another version was a bodysuit, or body shirt. You can still get these.
They have a snap or button crotch, with no shirttail to pull out. They
looked good until I started to get too bulgy for that sort of garment.
One of the brands I remember was Marum Mani-shirt, which had four
snaps, and otherwise looked like a tight-fitting T-shirt. (Marum also made
Mani-hose, tights for men.)
Nowadays, Privatina makes a lot of the same things for men and women.
http://privatina.shop-07.de/privatina-p ... elbod.html
There's also a company called onepiece.com
Bertino56
Active Member
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2015 9:36 pm

Re: ROMPERS. . . AARGghhhh!

Postby WesleyN » Sun Jul 09, 2017 9:40 pm

Not for me. And what would you do, when you want to go to the toilet?
User avatar
WesleyN
Distinguished Member
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2014 3:39 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: ROMPERS. . . AARGghhhh!

Postby mishawakaskirt » Mon Jul 10, 2017 1:29 am

rivegauche wrote:Huckleberry Finn wore a dress and was rumbled when he caught something thrown towards him by clamping his knees together instead of widening them to catch in the skirt of his dress.


I remember reading that as a young boy. I can't remember if I had already worn a skirt before or after reading that or not.

Also I must confess that about 15 years ago I bought a ladies floral print romper onesie whatever you prefer to call it. It actually fit pretty well, except in the sholders it was snug, the bottom end was nice and roomy. It was not my favorite garment in my closet. It is a nice change to have a garment that don't fasten snugly at the waist with elastic or a belt or waistband. Got rid of the romper a few years back. Never cared for the floral print. And only wore it in winter under mens clothes for extra
warmth. To go to the bathroon it was a big deal, if you don't take the entire thing off, you kind of have to drop it down behind you taking care you don't drop it in the toilet or floor. not easy.

I like wearing bib coveralls. I think they are the only mens garment that hangs from the sholders that is not considered a robe or dress. It is also kind of nice to have an extra pocket on the bib portion.

Mishawakakilt
User avatar
mishawakaskirt
Member Extraordinaire
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2015 9:59 pm
Location: Mishawaka, INDIANA USA

Re: ROMPERS. . . AARGghhhh!

Postby Ron » Mon Jul 10, 2017 3:15 am

mishawakaskirt wrote:
rivegauche wrote:
I like wearing bib coveralls. I think they are the only mens garment that hangs from the sholders that is not considered a robe or dress. It is also kind of nice to have an extra pocket on the bib portion.



I agree if I have to wear cursed 2 legged things I prefer biboveralls as I can't stand anything tight around my waist
User avatar
Ron
Member Extraordinaire
 
Posts: 298
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 12:35 am
Location: Central Wisconsin

Re: ROMPERS

Postby Gusto10 » Mon Jul 10, 2017 6:18 am

Bertino56 wrote:I had these back in the 1970s. They were never called "rompers" then.
They were a short-arm, short-leg version of jumpsuits, made and sold
by the makers of regular jumpsuits. One of my favorites was towel-like
terrycloth, with a clasp belt, just like the James Bond picture above.
Another version was a bodysuit, or body shirt. You can still get these.
They have a snap or button crotch, with no shirttail to pull out. They
looked good until I started to get too bulgy for that sort of garment.
One of the brands I remember was Marum Mani-shirt, which had four
snaps, and otherwise looked like a tight-fitting T-shirt. (Marum also made
Mani-hose, tights for men.)
Nowadays, Privatina makes a lot of the same things for men and women.
http://privatina.shop-07.de/privatina-p ... elbod.html
There's also a company called onepiece.com


Hmm, an adult baby shop. Doesn't it say it all?
Gusto10
Member Extraordinaire
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 12:07 pm

Re: Rompers

Postby Bertino56 » Tue Jul 11, 2017 6:22 pm

No, Gusto10, it does not. With all respect, you are jumping to conclusions.
What store you buy your skirts in does not say anything about you, or about
anybody else who shops at that store.
I have not bought from Privatina, but I assure you they have a diverse clientele.
I do not identify as "adult baby" (but I have met a few of them) and I don't
ridicule or otherwise disparage their interests, any more than they ridicule
my individuality and diverse interests in clothing.
Bertino56
Active Member
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2015 9:36 pm

Re: ROMPERS. . . AARGghhhh!

Postby Sinned » Wed Jul 12, 2017 6:51 am

I agree with Bertino - it says no more than if I went into a shop that only sold clothes targeted to women and bought something. It wouldn't indicate that I was trying to be a woman. The purchaser from the adult baby shop as you called it may just like the form or the style for comfort, similar reasons for why we wear skirts, and not for any associations with adult babyhood.
I believe in offering every assistance short of actual help but then mainly just want to be left to be myself in all my difference and uniqueness.
User avatar
Sinned
Member Extraordinaire
 
Posts: 2363
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:28 pm
Location: York, England

Previous

Return to Freestyle Fashions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest