jeanfor wrote:My feeling is that the fear is with us men more than anything else.
Indeed that seems to be the case -- and it's likely the case because we
are flaunting "conventional norms" and we're
aware of that. However, the
fear response isn't necessarily the best response to have; I prefer the notion of "risk assessment" over "fear", because we can ascertain the potential level of risk, and can alter our behaviours and looks to reflect that risk.
Risk, to each individual, will ,likely mean something completely different. For some, the biggest risk will be from a boss who "finds out" and cannot deal with the notion in a rational manner; for others, it may be a risk of ridicule that they'll find difficult to handle; for others still -- and this is a long-shot -- there's the risk (usually perceived) of violence for "stepping over the boundary" of the "conventional norms". Each of these requires different responses.
First off, fear of losing one's job is a powerful anti-motivator; it makes one toe the line precisely. It also turns us into subhumans. My skirt-wearing was a poorly-kept secret for years until I finally decided to take the risk to wear one to work openly -- and it was a virtual non-event. This may be different if you're in an externally-facing position in an uptight company, but if you're in an internal position it ought not be an issue.
Ridicule, unless it trends toward threat-behaviour, is easy enough to deal with: if somebody laughs at you, let it roll off your back and realise that you brightened up some poor ignoramous' day a bit.
Finally, if physical threat is a real possibility, I'd posit that that's not a situation one would want to be in in the first place -- irrespective of clothing. Basic self-preservation pretty much proscribes entering overtly dangerous situations unless it's absolutely necessary (or incredibly rewarding).