by crfriend on Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:03 pm
In early springtime a local attraction in our little town had an indignity put upon it by a family of beavers. Our local "rail trail" (a conservation movement that seeks to turn abandoned railroad rights-of-way into walking and cycling trails) had a 75-foot section wash out when a local population of the rodents dammed up the entrance-point to a drainage culvert. It has since been repaired, and today was the celebration of the re-opening. The trail runs from the upper reaches of the Wachussett Reservoir (that supplies Metropolitan Boston with its water) and continues, broadly speaking, west along the old route of the now-defunct Central Massachusetts Railroad.
Why does this matter? My excuse is that I wore a skirt to the event, both Sapphire and I got a great walk out of it (old railroad routes are wonderful for hiking and cycling), I get quite a few very nice autumn photographs, and I also received some interesting and nice comments on my attire. My outfit was a very safe one, with white dress shirt, red waistcoat, black skirt, black opaque tights, black dress shoes (which are also awesome walking shoes), and a contemporary pocket-watch (which one cannot tell when it's in the waistcoat pocket).
Commentary heard:
1) "I like your outfit" -- this was from a musician at one of the attractions along the old rail-bed (a mill rendered defunct when Boston built the reservoir and drowned the heart of my new home-town in the late 1800s). I offered a gentle nod of the head and a polite, "Thank you."
2) "Are you one of the interpreters here?" -- this came from a fellow walker who had ventured up the steep hill to the adjacent mill village site (both sites had extensive information posted at points of interest, mainly to point up what the function of the original structures (which are now naught but ruins and foundations) were. I politely answered, "No, I'm just out for a walk." His response was quite interesting indeed: "You just like traditional clothes then?" For some reason I wasn't really in the mood for deep discussion (being out of breath might have been one reason), nodded and said "yes", and that was that. "Traditional clothing?" I'm not aware that skirts on guys have ever been "traditional" in New England. (This dovetails into my notion of working for a look that's "believable" -- the look worked well enough to throw somebody who likely knows full-well that men have never worn skirts like the one I was wearing today in anything remotely resembling recent memory.)
3) "Are you trying to replicate a period look?" -- This came from the same musician as made comment nr. 1 -- and was an honest and sincere question; it was followed up with, "or is that just the way you like to dress?" I answered in the affirmative to the second portion of her query -- that it's just a look I like and that I am comfortable with. And that, as they say, was that.
Sapphire (who had helped with some of the items used in the celebration) and I had a ball. 'Twas a good time all the way 'round save that she's going to have blisters and sore feet for a few days. I feel invigorated by the excursion and feel the need to dig out my old beast of a chemical-camera so I can properly shoot some of the stuff I did with Sapphire's old digi-cam today (it was so nice to feel my "eye" begin to "think that way" again. (Heck, maybe I'll procure an external light-meter and take my grand-dad's camera for a walk, too! And a tripod.) I also feel encouraged by the commentary; those who took the time to actually engage me were thoughtful and polite, and their tone positive. Yes there were a couple of double-takes, but I suspect every skirt-wearing bloke here knows and understands those just fine, and that sometimes the funniest commentary comes from confused children who positively know that men don't wear skirts.
To finish the day off, we're heading out for dinner. I'll get Sapphire to snap a shot of me in a bit.