crfriend wrote:Sapphire and I just got back from dinner, and I wore my
floor-length purple "walking skirt", my petticoat underneath,
a lavender dress shirt, a (new) black waistcoat, and my
great-grandfather's pocket-watch.
<snip>
I'm getting closer to mastering the interaction of the long skirt
and the petticoat; this overall rig is going to live up to its name
as a "walking skirt" as I fully intend to take it out for jaunts on
the local "rail trail" once the weather is nice.
This is a serious "win".
Sarongman wrote:That's the brand, year model and colour of the (*^&%%&*) car that hit me on a roundabout a few weeks ago.The culprit was a sedan though! Like the outfit however
JRMILLER wrote:Skirt wearing is a strange, new world. Females were taught long ago what worked for what weather conditions and it's pretty much ingrained into them (notice how many are wearing pants).
Those of us who just started wearing skirts have to figure all of this out on our own.
I have a very nice, simple long fleece skirt that I like in the winter because it's warm. Problem is, however, it's so long that I have problems with it in wet and snowy weather. It likes to become "one" with the weather conditions... It also has a very large flare and I have to be careful it doesn't get stuck in the car door or drag through the salt stuck to the threshold in the car door as I enter and exit....
Kilts work better under these conditions, but they are not as warm. Kilts are very good for walking around in cool - warm (not cold weather), but they present a management issue if you plan to sit in close company with them. I find myself checking frequently to make sure I am not showing off my "neaths" to the other folks seated around me.
I am thinking mid-calf would be a good compromise and that's probably why women seem to favor them unless the weather is warm.
You are clearly in the "advanced class" and an ascending master as you manage your hooped critter. I can only hope to arrive at that level someday. Meanwhile, I will continue to work on these more manageable, but still tricky things that the ladies figured out and mostly abandoned for pants long ago!
crfriend wrote:JRMILLER wrote:Skirt wearing is a strange, new world. Females were taught long ago what worked for what weather conditions and it's pretty much ingrained into them (notice how many are wearing pants).
Sometimes I really wonder how much of that "living knowledge" is still extant in the general populace; recall that even for women ("females" sounds too clinical for my taste) skirts are now pretty much relegated to "special occasions" and, for the most part, have been replaced by trousers for everyday wear. I am fairly certain that there is a substantial population of women alive now who have never worn a skirt.
So, yes, it is a strange new world for us -- and given most of our seeming ages, it's not the sort of question we could ask our mothers. The notion of guys wearing skirts would likely be strange enough to them that the sorts of feedback we might get could be wrong or confusing, and that's depending on if they're still alive and we have the guts to actually ask!
JRMILLER wrote:[... M]y mother was a pretty understanding lady and seemed to manage my quirks and oddities as I grew up. However, asking her about the in's and out's of skirt management could amount to the last-straw. Since she's not around anymore (at least visibly), I can't ask.
I did wear my kilt to a visit with my sister this past Christmas. You should have heard her howl and go on about her brother wearing a skirt! What a hoot!
Then, after she calmed down she told me that both my father and grandfather wore kilts. This is something I did NOT KNOW!
Actually, my recollection is that women in my youth tended (and tend) to stick with one style and length of skirt most of the time, usually whatever everyone else was wearing. The summer and winter versions would differ mainly in the weight and maybe the fiber of the fabric. I don't think that "management" was such a big issue, because you didn't need to keep adjusting to different kinds of skirts. As for weather, well, when it got cold, you were cold, and when it got hot, you got hot.JRMILLER wrote:Skirt wearing is a strange, new world. Females were taught long ago what worked for what weather conditions and it's pretty much ingrained into them (notice how many are wearing pants). Those of us who just started wearing skirts have to figure all of this out on our own. ...
I've also found that somewhere between just above the ankle to mid-calf (25-33") is a good range for me, except when it's really hot, when I go for knee-length. Longer, and you have to worry about dragging or stepping on the hem, shorter, and you have to be really careful how you sit. I've noticed that if you look at pictures of traditional peasant or working-class women from centuries ago, their skirts also fall into this range.JRMILLER wrote:I am thinking mid-calf would be a good compromise and that's probably why women seem to favor them unless the weather is warm.
I wouldn't go with a standard square dance petticoat. The standard length is about 20-22", which is fine for an over-the-knee skirt like most of the women square dancers wear, but it will give a "lampshade" effect on a long skirt.Uncle Al wrote:If you're not to keen on the 'Hoop' showing/bulging above the bottom
of the skirt, you might consider a Square Dancer's petticoat.
AMM wrote:I remember when miniskirts came into fashion, and how there were practically formal classes in how to wear them and how to move in them without embarrassing yourself.
AMM wrote:I've also found that somewhere between just above the ankle to mid-calf (25-33") is a good range for me, except when it's really hot, when I go for knee-length. Longer, and you have to worry about dragging or stepping on the hem, shorter, and you have to be really careful how you sit. I've noticed that if you look at pictures of traditional peasant or working-class women from centuries ago, their skirts also fall into this range.
AMM wrote:Floor-length skirts, like Carl's, were for wealthy women who didn't have to work outdoors or walk in the mud, and who had servants to mend and clean the hems. Nowadays, they are for formal events, where you ape the manners of the idle rich.
AMM wrote:I wouldn't go with a standard square dance petticoat. The standard length is about 20-22", which is fine for an over-the-knee skirt like most of the women square dancers wear, but it will give a "lampshade" effect on a long skirt.
AMM wrote:One issue I've found with a petticoat: the skirt really does take up more room. I find I keep knocking things over.
AMM wrote:Like floor-length skirts, I think that it was at some level a display of wealth -- there's no way a poor woman could have done any work or even gotten in and out of her house in such a rig, even if she'd been able to get hold of one.
Since1982 wrote:A good movie to check out for long skirt and petticoats usages is "Gangs of New York" starring Cameron Diaz, Leo DiCaprio and Daniel Day-Lewis in the main roles. She changed her dresses and skirts (with underskirts and petticoats all the time) on a regular basis. There were also plenty of "female impersonators" in the movie. In one segment Diaz's character had to remind one he should have shaved closer to "pass" better. If that was historically correct, it surprised me that there were that many female impersonators around in 1862, the setting period of the movie.![]()
Return to Skirts and Kilts for Men
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest